Reparations

[Koondog]

I have went back and re-read this thread. No one even remotely hinted at wanting to fuck a 79 year old woman. Quite the opposite in fact. All posters found her quite repulsive.

 

[Zuckerman]

I have went back and re-read this thread. No one even remotely hinted at wanting to fuck a 79 year old woman. Quite the opposite in fact. All posters found her quite repulsive.

Then why all the talk about fucking her?

 

[Uniquelyme]

Then why all the talk about fucking her?

 

[Koondog]

Actually, all the talk was about NOT fucking her.

 

[Zuckerman]

Actually, all the talk was about NOT fucking her.

I don’t know, man. It sure seems like you have a hard-on for her.

 

[VJLUTZ]

Actually, all the talk was about NOT fucking her.

Exactly. The way I look at it is: if someone wants to take my satirical comment and then (out of the blue) try to psycho-analyze me because of it, then its a free country. But he can still go kiss my ass.

Maybe Zuckerman and Koujiao should get a room?

 

[charliebrown]

It is amazing how off track a thread can go!!!! Reparations and fucking Pelosi!!!! So, is Nancy Pelosi's pussy the only thing Black men are going to get as a reparations payment? Damn, that would be one way to put a quick end to any further discussions.

 

[Plat122]

Black men are going to tell you to keep Nancy Pelosi's pussy. They are going to want their 40 acres and a mule and 170 years of accrued interest.

 

[Koujiao]

Exactly. The way I look at it is: if someone wants to take my satirical comment and then (out of the blue) try to psycho-analyze me because of it, then its a free country. But he can still go kiss my ass.

Maybe Zuckerman and Koujiao should get a room?

I really got into your head. Lol.

 

[Koondog]

I don’t know, man. It sure seems like you have a hard-on for her.

Black men are going to tell you to keep Nancy Pelosi's pussy. They are going to want their 40 acres and a mule and 170 years of accrued interest.

Tell them this isn't 1865 and those people are long dead. This country needs to stop living in the past.

 

[Koondog]

Tell them this isn't 1865 and those people are long dead. This country needs to stop living in the past.

40 acres was a land confiscation military order given by the vengeful General Sherman. It was an unconstitutional act that he had no business making. You can't just take away land from people and give it to others and forego due process. The courts later rightly ruled on its unconstitutionality.

 

[TGBeldin]

Too bad the same has not been done in most the Native American land claims.

 

[Koondog]

Yeah they claimed to own all the land from Canada down to Mexico. So let's give it all back to them. That's feasible.

 

[Koondog]

Yeah they claimed to own all the land from Canada down to Mexico. So let's give it all back to them. That's feasible.

And the native tribes that had their land stolen and people enslaved by the stronger native tribes before the arrival of whitey can put in their claims too. Sounds like fun to sort out, right?

 

[TGBeldin]

There you go being hyperbolic again. No, not "all land" by any stretch. Some treaties and land deals were legitimate. But many were made with a cavalry troop and a "sign away your land or we will starve your tribe into extinction" choice. Litterally.

Add to that the treaties that have been conveniently ignoredand violated when minerals were found.

But then your view certainly does not surprise me.

 

[TGBeldin]

And the native tribes that had their land stolen and people enslaved by the stronger native tribes before the arrival of whitey can put in their claims too. Sounds like fun to sort out, right?

You can start by just abiding by the treaties the federal government signed.

But I see you have the Thomas Jefferson view of people.

 

[Koondog]

The problem is you can't go back in time hundreds of years and try to correct perceived injustices without harming the people living today.

 

[Koondog]

You can start by just abiding by the treaties the federal government signed.

But I see you have the Thomas Jefferson view of people.

Why start at that point in time? Native tribes had been stealing land from each other long before the dreaded european dominated America. How far back would you to take this?

 

[TGBeldin]

As I said, start with the supposedly legal treaties the US government signed.

If you do not believe those treaties should be honored for land, fishing, water rights, antiquities, promised (as identified in the treaties) health care, equipment, education, etc., then why do I not have the right to ignore my neighbor's land deed?

Most of them are not 300 years ago. Not even close.

And to turn your question around: how long would someone have to occupy your home before we argue "that is old history now, we can't give you your house back without harming other people"? A month? A year? Five years?

 

[charliebrown]

What is most politically convenient for votes!!!! Reparations for black people and texas for the hispanic people. Oh shit, did I say that!!!! Within a week of my typing this we will start hearing it in the DEM party. Wonder who we give that too?