I've replied to you twice with as much detail as possible...what is your exact ask? Free access for 90 days for anyone who was previously banned? Unless @topjimmy says otherwise, that's not going to happen. You want to know how many people were banned? No idea...but it was many. Hundreds, if not into thousands, as a rough guess. But what does that actually matter? Like we've said repeatedly, we're mainly interested in moving forward. If your membership here is contingent on what other members do, be my guest. If you want to be a lurker, that's fine. If you want to be here and actively contribute and receive intel, that's more than welcomed too. If you are truly sorry for beating a dead horse like you stated, then stop beating it.
The changes that have taken place, including a previous mod that is no longer here, along with members being reinstated after being unfairly banned has happened and will continue to happen. All other mechanisms of how the site operates, including writing reviews to earn private details access, that access being 45 days per approved review, etc. will stay the same. Barebones review that does not provide much intel will not be approved.
Unless I missed it, of all the posts that you've made under your new handle, you have yet to mention what your previous handle was, and haven't asked for it to be reinstated. Why is that? Let us know what it is, and we'll see what we can work out.
The changes that have taken place, including a previous mod that is no longer here, along with members being reinstated after being unfairly banned has happened and will continue to happen. All other mechanisms of how the site operates, including writing reviews to earn private details access, that access being 45 days per approved review, etc. will stay the same. Barebones review that does not provide much intel will not be approved.
Unless I missed it, of all the posts that you've made under your new handle, you have yet to mention what your previous handle was, and haven't asked for it to be reinstated. Why is that? Let us know what it is, and we'll see what we can work out.
I've replied to you twice with as much detail as possible...what is your exact ask? Free access for 90 days for anyone who was previously banned? Unless @topjimmy says otherwise, that's not going to happen. You want to know how many people were banned? No idea...but it was many. Hundreds, if not into thousands, as a rough guess. But what does that actually matter? Like we've said repeatedly, we're mainly interested in moving forward. If your membership here is contingent on what other members do, be my guest. If you want to be a lurker, that's fine. If you want to be here and actively contribute and receive intel, that's more than welcomed too. If you are truly sorry for beating a dead horse like you stated, then stop beating it.
The changes that have taken place, including a previous mod that is no longer here, along with members being reinstated after being unfairly banned has happened and will continue to happen. All other mechanisms of how the site operates, including writing reviews to earn private details access, that access being 45 days per approved review, etc. will stay the same. Barebones review that does not provide much intel will not be approved.
Unless I missed it, of all the posts that you've made under your new handle, you have yet to mention what your previous handle was, and haven't asked for it to be reinstated. Why is that? Let us know what it is, and we'll see what we can work out.
The changes that have taken place, including a previous mod that is no longer here, along with members being reinstated after being unfairly banned has happened and will continue to happen. All other mechanisms of how the site operates, including writing reviews to earn private details access, that access being 45 days per approved review, etc. will stay the same. Barebones review that does not provide much intel will not be approved.
Unless I missed it, of all the posts that you've made under your new handle, you have yet to mention what your previous handle was, and haven't asked for it to be reinstated. Why is that? Let us know what it is, and we'll see what we can work out.
It would help greatly if we knew what your previous handle was...[/QQUOTE
let me start by saying that Respectfully, I had posted to TJ... he stated that he was the man. Top dog. Head honcho. Buck stops here guy.. everyone on the board seemed to agree w that.. as far as anyone else, I don't k ow anyone here. Don't have a group of homies, don't have a few dudes in my clique that lube each other up after each post w a thumbs up and an attaboy. I tried to contact the site and thought I did through the contact us feature. I thought that the notification in my box was the reply. You telling me to trust me we've got this all figured out is pretty much what everybody heard before 1000 people got banned. I'd like not to air my main concern or fear on this board in this forum and immediately start the nonsense from the defenders of the universe.
I did try to contact the site and I sent two notifications of who I was and my activity. I also tried contacting the site from various IP addresses Ober the past 3 months ...I have stated that I posted 3 reviews. 1 banned w my IP blocked because I forgot to put the name of the attendant or the phone number. I dont recall. It was messed up because it took me a while to get up the comfort to even try. I then created a new handle. Put up a review of another place and received access and only then realized what some of the reviews include as ID NEVER SEEN ONE SO DIDNT KNOW ..I thought that mgmt was aware that I had the new handle and was letting it slide as the first banning was ridiculous. A discussion came up and I contributed to it and someone threatened that I could be banned. I said I already was. I then wrote a new review and it was not accepted for Something completely inconsequential. That review was rejected and then I was banned for violation of TOS. The second ban I could understand as I stated I'd had access previously and was banned. The first was zero reason and the rejection of the review was BS.
I saw several guys say they had paid for service and gotten banned. The site was bending over backwards to refund them those fees and reimburse/ reinstate their service. To me. A bigger gesture would be to reinstate the access to the guys that got banned that actually wrote a review for that access. Those are the people adding to the site. Those are the lifeblood of the site and those reviews are what makes people follow. Not the guy that paid for access ( although they should also be taken care of)
My ask is simple. Every member that is being reinstated and had access at the time of the bullshit ban should be reinstated w access. It's a simple ask. It's fair to all of those guys. Also if someone was banned because of missing info on a review and never got access.. they should get the 45 days as well. Is that an outrageous ask? It is the easiest request imaginable. If TJ does not want to do it that is fine.
But after reading his post which you provided to me, I'd say that he is all about making things right and would think he would be all over making that happen. It gets guys involved agsin, it makes people active and it gives them the thing they were denied by this site .. access to review. It isn't a permanent access it's merely rewarding them for the contribution to this site that they already made. As soon as that access is up they either write reviews or become lurkers as u would say.
My tone and my post may not sit well w you but your reply to me seems like sosdd at this site.
So look at the message ai sent through the website and u will know exactly who I am and u can even cross reference my IP which the site and its mods can do ...or just take the "2" off of my handle to find out what my first handle was.
I think that the outcome I asked for ...not just for me but people that contributed... Is a no brain .."absolutely" after reading TJs note I thought he would agree wholeheartedly. Your response was not what I expected..
No disrespect to you but I was expecting a reply from TJ or no reply at all. The last time someone in your position didn't like my posts ...well we already know about that.
Cheers mate.
let me start by saying that Respectfully, I had posted to TJ... he stated that he was the man. Top dog. Head honcho. Buck stops here guy.. everyone on the board seemed to agree w that.. as far as anyone else, I don't k ow anyone here. Don't have a group of homies, don't have a few dudes in my clique that lube each other up after each post w a thumbs up and an attaboy. I tried to contact the site and thought I did through the contact us feature. I thought that the notification in my box was the reply. You telling me to trust me we've got this all figured out is pretty much what everybody heard before 1000 people got banned. I'd like not to air my main concern or fear on this board in this forum and immediately start the nonsense from the defenders of the universe.
I did try to contact the site and I sent two notifications of who I was and my activity. I also tried contacting the site from various IP addresses Ober the past 3 months ...I have stated that I posted 3 reviews. 1 banned w my IP blocked because I forgot to put the name of the attendant or the phone number. I dont recall. It was messed up because it took me a while to get up the comfort to even try. I then created a new handle. Put up a review of another place and received access and only then realized what some of the reviews include as ID NEVER SEEN ONE SO DIDNT KNOW ..I thought that mgmt was aware that I had the new handle and was letting it slide as the first banning was ridiculous. A discussion came up and I contributed to it and someone threatened that I could be banned. I said I already was. I then wrote a new review and it was not accepted for Something completely inconsequential. That review was rejected and then I was banned for violation of TOS. The second ban I could understand as I stated I'd had access previously and was banned. The first was zero reason and the rejection of the review was BS.
I saw several guys say they had paid for service and gotten banned. The site was bending over backwards to refund them those fees and reimburse/ reinstate their service. To me. A bigger gesture would be to reinstate the access to the guys that got banned that actually wrote a review for that access. Those are the people adding to the site. Those are the lifeblood of the site and those reviews are what makes people follow. Not the guy that paid for access ( although they should also be taken care of)
My ask is simple. Every member that is being reinstated and had access at the time of the bullshit ban should be reinstated w access. It's a simple ask. It's fair to all of those guys. Also if someone was banned because of missing info on a review and never got access.. they should get the 45 days as well. Is that an outrageous ask? It is the easiest request imaginable. If TJ does not want to do it that is fine.
But after reading his post which you provided to me, I'd say that he is all about making things right and would think he would be all over making that happen. It gets guys involved agsin, it makes people active and it gives them the thing they were denied by this site .. access to review. It isn't a permanent access it's merely rewarding them for the contribution to this site that they already made. As soon as that access is up they either write reviews or become lurkers as u would say.
My tone and my post may not sit well w you but your reply to me seems like sosdd at this site.
So look at the message ai sent through the website and u will know exactly who I am and u can even cross reference my IP which the site and its mods can do ...or just take the "2" off of my handle to find out what my first handle was.
I think that the outcome I asked for ...not just for me but people that contributed... Is a no brain .."absolutely" after reading TJs note I thought he would agree wholeheartedly. Your response was not what I expected..
No disrespect to you but I was expecting a reply from TJ or no reply at all. The last time someone in your position didn't like my posts ...well we already know about that.
Cheers mate.
