Oh brother. Must be nice to live a life of perfect equanimity and zero contradiction. Please skip the dime store moral lessons, we’re all adults here, and many of us are married. We’re therefore cheating with sex workers, we know it’s wrong, but we’ve made our separate peace with that. That’s what I mean by being a hypocrite and I don’t need your didactic lessons to enlighten me.
You’re reacting like I called you a hypocrite, which I didn’t and which I wouldn’t have even brought up if you hadn’t referred to yourself that way. I’m not perfect by any means, and others might disagree about how I define right and wrong, but I’m not a hypocrite, because if I think something is wrong, I don’t do it. As that relates to marriage and this hobby, I’d never have gotten married if I hadn’t met a woman who was OK with open sexuality in marriage, because I never wanted to betray the trust of someone who’s supposed to be able to trust me completely, like that. It’s none of my business what others do in their marriages, but since you raised the issue, I don’t consider myself perfect, but I knew I never wanted to be banging other women behind the back of my wife, speaking strictly for myself, that is, and I knew I could never be monogamous.
Blixen said:
This is simplistic. Thoughts and desires are profoundly altered by habits and lifestyle. Overindulging in porn for example, absolutely alters one’s thoughts, by suggesting sexual interpretations or innuendo in many non-sexual situations. This is the stuff of sex addiction.
I’m sorry, but I completely disagree. I’m sure that I’m hardly the only guy who watches porn practically daily without it having any effect whatsoever on my thoughts about women and sex. Nor do I think I’m special, so if I can do that, so can other guys who don’t have other “issues” that aren’t determined by their porn habits. Likewise, it’s also possible to be addicted to porn and/or sex with an endless list of providers without that affecting your thoughts about women or sex or anything else. Addiction is a totally separate issue, because you can be addicted to porn without it affecting your attitude or expectations or behavior; and you can have a horrible attitude towards women and sex without being addicted to anything.
Blixen said:
The notion that you’re a “perfect gentleman” no matter what’s going on in your head so long as you keep it hidden is absurd; imagine a person constantly thinking about raping children but just barely keeping it to himself. A “perfect gentleman”? Of course not. A profoundly sick individual with a double life.
Again, I totally disagree. I removed the qualifier “just barely” because that implication makes it worse by suggesting the person in question might act on his internal desires, which isn’t what we’re discussing and disagreeing about. Someone who isn’t turned on by raping children deserves no “credit” for not doing it; but someone who actually does have that inexplicable horrible internal desire and who chooses to resist it because he knows it’s horrible and who lives his entire life never acting on it, precisely because he understands it’s horrific, deserves credit for that choice, not condemnation for an internal urge that he never chose to have in the first place and purposely avoided ever acting on. The worse and more extreme your urges, the more moral credit you deserve for never acting on them.
Blixen said:
That’s an extreme example but I think a lot of guys suffer from degrees of sex and porn addiction that warp their perspectives around women. And as you put it, leak into their behavior.
Actually, that happens to be my usual example to illustrate this concept, but people tend to either over-react when I use that exact example, or they attack the premise of the analogy by accusing me of “equating” child rape with whatever urge we’re actually discussing. That’s why I chose not to use it here. However, It’s actually a perfect analogy, now that you brought it up, and I’ve already suggested the appropriate analysis above.