Math is a bit off. The first $50K is only if they didn't pay in full up front, then they wouldn't need to make the second $50K to pay back the people back home. Or they did pay in full upfront, which means the second $50K wouldn't be needed. The $50K vig is absolutely possible. Should be $100K either way.
I mean the team will "help" send 50k overseas to your husband or children or parents or whatever, and for that they will assess that 50k plus another 50k because you don't know how to do it yourself. The numbers can be 10k or 100k or any number you like, the point is that it isn't free or cheap to do the thing these girls do, and that the line between slavery and indentured servitude is very thin; more than half of the people who came to the US during the great emptying of Europe came here as indentured servants, even decades after slavery and indentured servitude were abolished. Even today, does anyone really believe that all the folks walking across the border are the result of anything less than companies like JBS having had enough of cityfolk who don't come to work on time or come to work high or drunk or absent every other Friday after payday or having had enough of entitled babies who demand to be CEO and make 100k on their first day, and paying the feudal lords to "accidentally invite" some fornnners over for a visit? Being kidnapped and taken someplace and made to do things for no pay and being property of someone else, this is slavery, or as DHS calls it these days "human trafficking". Choosing to take the offer of X debt in exchange for working it off, well, that's indentured servitude, and sounds like what millions of muricans do every minute with their credit card and their cable tv and their 1000$ sailfoam and their 500$ a month car and their 800k McMansion.
Not sure exactly the practical difference between an AMP girl owing some money to people and having to work it off is different from your neighbor owing some money to Bank of America and having to work it off, or you incurring the debt of other people and then having to work it off and have it taken from your wages in taxes. OK sure the thing they do for the manney is not legal, but when DHS or the sheriff or the DA bust down a door claiming "human trafficking", they are claiming there is slavery happening, against their will human rights violations. This is disingenuous BS that they ought to know better than to do, and people of those towns ought to be, on principle, against that kind of official oppression. But they aren't, until the oppression comes to their door, and then it's oh lawdy lawdy. More disingenuous people.