-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
What is your opinion on BANNED MEMBERS
- Thread starter topjimmy
- Start date
I have no idea.. I just called out shills in general and him his shilling crew bounced on me. Never mentioned anyones name. But now I gotta expose this dude for being a crooked shill. Keep going @Uniquelyme lol .. I got more, best has yet to come.
You a bozo. Post the proof it's me.
have the mods check my pms to see me recruiting on here.Never scared when you're an honest person. Let's gooooo. That's my final point . That's my challenge.
Making false accusations on people is silly and no better than what Rampage was doing when he was banning multiple people on assumptions.
Assumptions without concrete proof is silly and non productive. When it comes to shills, everyone that has hobbied can tell who a shill is. You can tell how they review and how they underestimate ages on purpose and or how they never say anything negative about places.
He stated how he can rid this place of shills . When so many people returned from banishment off of assumptions already. That's the irony. Everyone is thankful they got to come back. And here comes a loudmouth talking about he has the formula to spot the shills. And he will send the formula pm to the mods.
Assumptions without concrete proof is silly and non productive. When it comes to shills, everyone that has hobbied can tell who a shill is. You can tell how they review and how they underestimate ages on purpose and or how they never say anything negative about places.
He stated how he can rid this place of shills . When so many people returned from banishment off of assumptions already. That's the irony. Everyone is thankful they got to come back. And here comes a loudmouth talking about he has the formula to spot the shills. And he will send the formula pm to the mods.
Making false accusations on people is silly and no better than what Rampage was doing when he was banning multiple people on assumptions.
Assumptions without concrete proof is silly and non productive. When it comes to shills, everyone that has hobbied can tell who a shill is. You can tell how they review and how they underestimate ages on purpose and or how they never say anything negative about places.
He stated how he can rid this place of shills . When so many people returned from banishment off of assumptions already. That's the irony. Everyone is thankful they got to come back. And here comes a loudmouth talking about he has the formula to spot the shills. And he will send the formula pm to the mods.
Assumptions without concrete proof is silly and non productive. When it comes to shills, everyone that has hobbied can tell who a shill is. You can tell how they review and how they underestimate ages on purpose and or how they never say anything negative about places.
He stated how he can rid this place of shills . When so many people returned from banishment off of assumptions already. That's the irony. Everyone is thankful they got to come back. And here comes a loudmouth talking about he has the formula to spot the shills. And he will send the formula pm to the mods.
I don't like that my account got banned with no notice, or idea what it was that I had done wrong, and no way to find out, just a generic "you have been banned for violating TOS. to the best of my knowledge, I had not violated anything, but if I had, a warning would have been appreciated, as a relatively new member. there were a lot of warning postings about various things, and was a lot to go through. (there are less now, easier to manage) I have a feeling I was banned because of 785 comments (I had not written a review on them yet) as I saw that warning was up when I opened the site from a different device. it was not up when I made comments, to the best of my knowledge. again, a washing with a temp ban would have been more appropriate, I think. but I could be wrong
I think it's time to let bygones be bygones and move forward.
It's only a few days since @topjimmy got back and we're already seeing lots of improvements.
If you don't like someone's comments/reviews just put them on ignore. This is the way we handle SPAM email - set your own filters.
Mods are volunteers, don't need to saddle them with every little bit of task you're able to help yourself such as putting someone on ignore.
It's only a few days since @topjimmy got back and we're already seeing lots of improvements.
If you don't like someone's comments/reviews just put them on ignore. This is the way we handle SPAM email - set your own filters.
Mods are volunteers, don't need to saddle them with every little bit of task you're able to help yourself such as putting someone on ignore.
You came out of pocket at me and now you wanna play victim after you got ya card pulled you thought you was a big bad bully huh.. I got your real name, pics, videos of you in these establishments and I’m in ya telegram group. You picked the right one today.
you thought you was a big bad bully huh.. I got your real name, pics, videos of you in these establishments and I’m in ya telegram group. You picked the right one today.
Let me set the record straight on a couple things….
Traffic is actually up. Way up.
The problem is that members were being banned at an astronomical rate with no rhyme nor reason to it. This impacted activity (not traffic, just activity) and essentially turned this site into a bloody battlefield full of needless and unnecessary innocent casualties. That’s all resolved now.
As for shills. That’s low priority in my book. Not gonna run around trying to catch shills. This staff’s not gonna do that. We are gonna encourage sharing and contributions, and the members can decide for themselves based on the intel available to them.
Oh also, I’ve no problem with private groups. Perfectly fine. And if they have a ton of activity, that’s great! The more intel out there the better.
Have a great day
@topjimmy - We are gonna encourage sharing and contributions, and the members can decide for themselves based on the intel available to them.
Spot on! Members deciding for themselves is the adult way to handle things. Members who spout untruths will get called out for it and eventually lose credibility. Setting up a moderator bureaucracy to handle "misinformation" is as silly here as it is for the rest of the Internet. Especially in a free society.
Spot on! Members deciding for themselves is the adult way to handle things. Members who spout untruths will get called out for it and eventually lose credibility. Setting up a moderator bureaucracy to handle "misinformation" is as silly here as it is for the rest of the Internet. Especially in a free society.
Im sorry if this has been talked about previously and/or if the reason has already been determined. Im not big on reading all the messages in the main Forum Boards.
But, I still would like to lobby for when you click into a area forum example CNJ instead of a bunch of reviews from all over CNJ clumped together. I would love to see sub-forums listed for the individual AMP's. Even if its to large of a task to list every AMP. Maybe sub-forums that have certain location ranges example Printceton/Windsor Area, Edison/New Brusnwick area, Trenton/Lawrence/Ewing area ect. That way the main stay here that actually leave reviews and share real intel can easily focus on leaving and finding valuable information. Another great example would be SNJ Atlantic City/Absecon/Egg Harbor area.
I think most will agree that the current setup leaves a lot to be missed in the way of when someone submits a review at a certain time of day and someone else comes along a day later or even hours later looking for intel for that same area/amp there is a good chance they may not even see the review. Plus the search engines seem to be a little off depending on how the review was named etc.
Just throwing it out there. Either way, all is good.
MV
But, I still would like to lobby for when you click into a area forum example CNJ instead of a bunch of reviews from all over CNJ clumped together. I would love to see sub-forums listed for the individual AMP's. Even if its to large of a task to list every AMP. Maybe sub-forums that have certain location ranges example Printceton/Windsor Area, Edison/New Brusnwick area, Trenton/Lawrence/Ewing area ect. That way the main stay here that actually leave reviews and share real intel can easily focus on leaving and finding valuable information. Another great example would be SNJ Atlantic City/Absecon/Egg Harbor area.
I think most will agree that the current setup leaves a lot to be missed in the way of when someone submits a review at a certain time of day and someone else comes along a day later or even hours later looking for intel for that same area/amp there is a good chance they may not even see the review. Plus the search engines seem to be a little off depending on how the review was named etc.
Just throwing it out there. Either way, all is good.
MV
