AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Fawn Philly

Gregg R

Registered Member
Messages: 17
Joined
#22
Unless I misread your first response to me, you refereed to me as a "monger" , correct? I know I am a buyer not a seller which is why I pointed the definition out.
 

eagle1682

Review Contributor
Messages: 118
Reviews: 29
Joined
#23
I think I put less information on my taxes.
If I was a litte long winded I get it. I was just trying to be informative as intel is the reason we're all here. I've benefited from other reviews and intel, and wanted to make a worthwhile review and contribution to the board.
 

trigger539

Registered Member
Messages: 18
Reviews: 4
Joined
#26
The providers that demand extensive personal information before seeing clients are absurd IMO. The majority of their clients are just regular joes with a lot to lose if their personal contact information were connected to a provider. Guys who comply, power to ya and good luck if or when her hard drive is seized by LE. The irony is most police departments, Philly included, issued statements weeks ago they are NOT investigating, arresting or following up on a list of "crimes" including prostitution.
They do it for their safety. I understand that. I don't provide it for my safety. I miss out on that level of service. They miss out on my donations but I'm sure they are not jonesing for clients.

I wish it were otherwise because I'm happy to pay. She looks and sounds delicious.
 

cravenmorehead

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,038
Reviews: 46
Joined
#27
They do it for their safety. I understand that. I don't provide it for my safety. I miss out on that level of service. They miss out on my donations but I'm sure they are not jonesing for clients.

I wish it were otherwise because I'm happy to pay. She looks and sounds delicious.
Fawn is fabulous and 100% trustworthy, get screened for a nice screwing, or remain unscrewed!
 

vman1970

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,094
Reviews: 44
Joined
#29
It’s simple. If the screening is too much for you move on. Constant whining about ladies or amps that screen gets you nowhere. If too many people dont want to be screened maybe they’ll change or go away. But clearly there are people who are happy to go through it for a quality service. It’s like complaining about what girls charge. You don’t like it do go. If enough people don’t want to pay their rates they’ll change or go away.
 

kantuchdis

Review Contributor
Messages: 4,384
Reviews: 54
Joined
#30
News flash... this forum is a discussion board for trading opinions. Individuals opinions differ from others. Labeling another's opinion as whining shows a deep misunderstanding of the concept of conversation. After 39 posts in this thread not one person suggested Fawn The Asian must change her screening requirements, they only opined whether they believe her tactics are reasonable, or unreasonable. Some even provided sound supportive information to back up their opinion, both for, and against.
 

kantuchdis

Review Contributor
Messages: 4,384
Reviews: 54
Joined
#31
If I was a litte long winded I get it. I was just trying to be informative as intel is the reason we're all here. I've benefited from other reviews and intel, and wanted to make a worthwhile review and contribution to the board.
I presumed XPX was referring to the personal information required by FTA in order to be approved, or rejected by her screener, not the length or details you provided in your review. As this board continues to demonstrate no good deed shall go unpunished, but I am shocked the Prude Police have not pounced on the details provided as being too graphic. For me? great review!
 

jim_hatez

Moderator
Messages: 1,914
Reviews: 175
Joined
#32
I presumed XPX was referring to the personal information required by FTA in order to be approved, or rejected by her screener, not the length or details you provided in your review. As this board continues to demonstrate no good deed shall go unpunished, but I am shocked the Prude Police have not pounced on the details provided as being too graphic. For me? great review!
Kant and I don't always agree but I agree here very much with him. Private details is for private details. Why have that section if it is not supposed to be used? The more details the more helpful the review. It's up to the writer to decide what to include, but when they include too little they get bashed, now sometimes too much they get bashed. I think as long as you stay away from details which jeopardize "security" of a provider or yourself, you should be fine.
 

Niceguy0388

Philly Philly
Messages: 1,833
Reviews: 73
Joined
#33
Fawn offers numerous options for screening. Easiest is 2 reference or p411. if you dont have that then you provide employment info/ID etc. Her screening are pretty standard for independent/agency girls. If you dont have/want to provide those info then move on and stick to amps...
 

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,118
Reviews: 96
Joined
#34
Employment info is hard when you are self employed and semi retired. I gave up on business cards a long time ago when I went solo.
 

vman1970

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,094
Reviews: 44
Joined
#35
News flash... this forum is a discussion board for trading opinions. Individuals opinions differ from others. Labeling another's opinion as whining shows a deep misunderstanding of the concept of conversation. After 39 posts in this thread not one person suggested Fawn The Asian must change her screening requirements, they only opined whether they believe her tactics are reasonable, or unreasonable. Some even provided sound supportive information to back up their opinion, both for, and against.
:eek::rolleyes:
 

Ronin

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,040
Reviews: 45
Joined
#36
I'm sure she 's not . You do realize that a "monger" is someone who is selling something , right?
For the sake of semantics, it actually means someone who is promoting something. Generally used in a negative context. In this case the word “whore” is unspoken but implicitly understood. But my belief is the reason it’s omitted here, is because many of us don’t perceive the women that way. This is one of the few countries in the world that applies a bullshit double standard.
 

kantuchdis

Review Contributor
Messages: 4,384
Reviews: 54
Joined
#38
I never thought much about the origin or meaning of monger. Always considered guys who patronize whores as whore mongers. A long time ago I thought a whore monger was a guy who banged a lot of babes, but not necessarily paying them. Actually back then it never occurred to me that paying a whore was a thing, whores were just girls who fucked a lot of guys, for free. Innocent times. Of course both terms whore and monger have negative connotations, but the only reason this forum exists is for guys to discuss their unspeakable actions in the world of whores and mongering.
 

Ronin

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,040
Reviews: 45
Joined
#39
My thought has been that we’re almost always paying for it, one way or another. For me, there’s been the occasional, no strings attached freebie, but that’s been the exception, not the rule.
 
Top