-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Review: Ella at BunnyGirls
- Thread starter Zippy17
- Start date
FYI: when you go to an Amp at anytime before your football crosses the touchdown plain, if you have an uncertainty or uncomfortability about anything with the amp or the provider or you would rather keep your dough you will get 100% of your money back. For example I was in an amp and paid $260 up front to the provide, she was a strong 8 with big tits but you can strike a match with the bottom of her feet which was a major turnoff for me but it had to be discontinue. I respectfully spoke to the MMS and in turn she gave me my money back and I was on my way. In this game your first reaction is always right so go with it, no need to martyr yourself and waste your money attempting to be funny on a message board
I was trying to see what she looked like yesterday when I was there for Lisa (who’s pics are real) but Ella was busy when I came And when I left. Another review said She was big but not as bad as reported here. Who knows??
You don’t like someone just walk out, why is that so hard? I understand the issue with fake pics, I got plenty of them too but when I arrive if I don’t like, I fucking take my shit, say thank you and leave! having said that my 2cents are , it feels like buyers remorse. You obviously saw her before you paid, you stay, it’s on you. These girls have thick skin (no pun intended) they take rejection everyday purely based on looks. Idk it’s simple like that for me.
@Zippy17 It’s your money you decide who to spend it on, don’t feel bad walking out.
I did see Bailey and Kiki
Bailey is a smoke show. Kiki is cute.
You don’t like someone just walk out, why is that so hard? I understand the issue with fake pics, I got plenty of them too but when I arrive if I don’t like, I fucking take my shit, say thank you and leave! having said that my 2cents are , it feels like buyers remorse. You obviously saw her before you paid, you stay, it’s on you. These girls have thick skin (no pun intended) they take rejection everyday purely based on looks. Idk it’s simple like that for me.
@Zippy17 It’s your money you decide who to spend it on, don’t feel bad walking out.
I did see Bailey and Kiki
Bailey is a smoke show. Kiki is cute.
I’ve got some other comments from other guys who saw me in the store, someone else said they are fake profiles paid by the spa store to review me on here haha. That’s insane! I’m not that bad as my beloved reviewer Zippy17 said and of course I ll not show any picture here to prove as i have clients who pick and choose me and I’m happy with that. When I’ll need more clients, probably I will haha
Honestly. I was gonna see her today. I’ve heard people mention her amazing BJ skills and I’ve been looking for someone who’d be good enough to make me finish that way (something I haven’t had yet). Anyway, it wasn’t your review that turned me off of her.
But the way she responded to you. Her posts here were a major turn off. I don’t want to give money to someone who’d respond like that.
But the way she responded to you. Her posts here were a major turn off. I don’t want to give money to someone who’d respond like that.
Zippy - thanks for this truthful heads-up!
To be useful, all non-shill reviews here should discuss how close the actual appearance is to the photos. And even if very different, rate the face and body so people have some clue. Many reviews already do this. Maybe the absence of it is a sign of a potential shill review.
It would also be helpful if the website provided a way we could set some reviewers and spas to "Ignore" so they clog up our searches. Maybe out all Ignored reviews and spas in an "Ignored" sub-thread in case we want to pick through garbage.
Also, we all definitely need to walk out more often when the discrepancy is too bad. Eventually, that may force the spas and the bookers and everyone else in the supply chain to stop trying to pass off 4's as 10's via photos.
I also try to have realisitic expectations. I usually expect the provider to be older, thicker, etc than the photos.
But its still very annoying when the photo "is of her" but still a million miles away from the actual provider.
To be useful, all non-shill reviews here should discuss how close the actual appearance is to the photos. And even if very different, rate the face and body so people have some clue. Many reviews already do this. Maybe the absence of it is a sign of a potential shill review.
It would also be helpful if the website provided a way we could set some reviewers and spas to "Ignore" so they clog up our searches. Maybe out all Ignored reviews and spas in an "Ignored" sub-thread in case we want to pick through garbage.
Also, we all definitely need to walk out more often when the discrepancy is too bad. Eventually, that may force the spas and the bookers and everyone else in the supply chain to stop trying to pass off 4's as 10's via photos.
I also try to have realisitic expectations. I usually expect the provider to be older, thicker, etc than the photos.
But its still very annoying when the photo "is of her" but still a million miles away from the actual provider.
No problem, but I’ve actually been trying to let this thread die a natural death, because I had no interest in arguing about it. She’s new to this and obviously doesn’t understand that the purpose of this forum is for guys to share honest reviews, and it’s definitely not intended for providers to come here to refute unflattering reviews. Providers have their own forums where they share their impressions and comments about us and we don’t have access to post refutations of their opinions about us.
One of her comments was that “of course” she won’t post a new photo. That makes absolutely no sense to me at all, because if I were a provider who thought someone’s description of me was unfair, I’d immediately post a new selfie showing me in the exact same outfit and pose as the photo used by the spa. Nobody cares how “confident” she is or what she says other guys have said. Appearance is subjective and I acknowledged that plenty of guys might find her very attractive. My problem wasn’t with her appearance, but with the difference between that outdated spa photo and 2023 reality. She should have simply posted a new selfie here displaying the date and covering her face exactly the way she covered her face in that spa photo. That’s all anybody reading would need to determine whether my comments were fair and accurate.
As I said already several times, I had no conceivable motivation for posting any review that isn’t 100% truthful. The suggestion by someone else that it was “buyer’s remorse” is also nonsensical, because that was actually the least I’ve ever spent and the first time I ever cut an appointment short after meeting the girl. I acknowledged that it was totally my fault for not just walking out, which is what I should have done. My review history here shows that, almost without exception, I’m extremely complimentary to providers and that I go into great detail about all the reasons my other experiences with the providers I’ve reviewed were so great. I’ve also had my share of being on the wrong end of YMMV situations and have never once held that against the girl at all or posted a bad review; I just didn’t review them. @Uniquelyme summed it up best: “No outdated pics no encounter” because I never should have been there that day in the first place.
One of her comments was that “of course” she won’t post a new photo. That makes absolutely no sense to me at all, because if I were a provider who thought someone’s description of me was unfair, I’d immediately post a new selfie showing me in the exact same outfit and pose as the photo used by the spa. Nobody cares how “confident” she is or what she says other guys have said. Appearance is subjective and I acknowledged that plenty of guys might find her very attractive. My problem wasn’t with her appearance, but with the difference between that outdated spa photo and 2023 reality. She should have simply posted a new selfie here displaying the date and covering her face exactly the way she covered her face in that spa photo. That’s all anybody reading would need to determine whether my comments were fair and accurate.
As I said already several times, I had no conceivable motivation for posting any review that isn’t 100% truthful. The suggestion by someone else that it was “buyer’s remorse” is also nonsensical, because that was actually the least I’ve ever spent and the first time I ever cut an appointment short after meeting the girl. I acknowledged that it was totally my fault for not just walking out, which is what I should have done. My review history here shows that, almost without exception, I’m extremely complimentary to providers and that I go into great detail about all the reasons my other experiences with the providers I’ve reviewed were so great. I’ve also had my share of being on the wrong end of YMMV situations and have never once held that against the girl at all or posted a bad review; I just didn’t review them. @Uniquelyme summed it up best: “No outdated pics no encounter” because I never should have been there that day in the first place.