AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Moderators: time frame for review after appointment

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#1
A lot of members have speculated on how much time can elapse between a visit to a provider and posting a review. I checked the TopJimmy review guidelines but there is no mention of an acceptable time frame. Can a moderator weigh in to give some guidance so we know when it’s too late to post a review of an encounter.
 

Chiparlor

Has Decided to Walk on Earth.
Messages: 2,604
Reviews: 38
Joined
#3
Up to the OP. We know parlors rotate girls x weeks. For example, a parlor replace the entire team every 2 weeks. Suppose you had a wonderful hospitalization with Ruby at a parlor on 11/1/2019 and posted a review on 12/4/2019. The review may be pointless for that parlor, but worth to know "Ruby" if you see her name pop up somewhere else.

Another thing to consider. Some mongers wait few days later and post a review.

If provider say or ask no reviews, suggest to oblige and keep both parlor and provider utr.

Can share via pm to your trusted mongers if both parties are comfortable.

Many other factors to consider.

Hope this helps!
 

retired051923

Don't PM me.
Messages: 1,161
Reviews: 10
Joined
#5
https://www.ampreviews.net/index.php?threads/would-you-like-your-reviews-to-be-approved.3030/

It is all there. The first paragraph states "You can not review the same person within 90 days and receive site credit." This is obviously to keep people from spamming the board with the same reviews over and over to accumulate credit.

In the "Date" section. "I will not credit a review older than 30 days ago." This is to keep things as recent as possible while giving members a cushion. Not everybody rushes to write a review immediately but, it should be in the past 30 days.
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#7
https://www.ampreviews.net/index.php?threads/would-you-like-your-reviews-to-be-approved.3030/

It is all there. The first paragraph states "You can not review the same person within 90 days and receive site credit." This is obviously to keep people from spamming the board with the same reviews over and over to accumulate credit.

In the "Date" section. "I will not credit a review older than 30 days ago." This is to keep things as recent as possible while giving members a cushion. Not everybody rushes to write a review immediately but, it should be in the past 30 days.
I understood this post was antiquated and wasn’t sure what information was still relevant and what wasn’t. Some had mentioned a one week guideline, some 20 days, saw reviews with longer time frames etc. so I was looking for clarity. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

retired051923

Don't PM me.
Messages: 1,161
Reviews: 10
Joined
#8
There is some grey area as well. I've never heard of a 1 week rule or 20 day rule. A really good review can be 35 days old and we will still reward credit. If someone shows they could be a valuable member to the community, not gonna run them off over a few days.
 

casualplayer

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,289
Reviews: 60
Joined
#9
I think the 90 days between the same girl should be reviewed as well. I can see not reviewing the same girl every week - however, If you see her twice in say a 2 or 3 week time and the visit is considerably better why not? 3 months? That's a bit much. I say this to establish a pattern with return visits. This could be limited to X visits. But I know that's extra work and you guys have enough already.
 

retired051923

Don't PM me.
Messages: 1,161
Reviews: 10
Joined
#10
Just because a review is rejected does not mean it is deleted from the site. You can post all the reviews you want for followups. Nothing wrong with sharing Private Details to Contributors. Just don't expect site credit for it. It's no secret people will write bullshit on here. We aren't giving site credit to someone that posts about the same person daily, weekly, monthly so they have 5000 days of credit. There are plenty of members here that review the same person over and over and they get the "Your Review was Rejected for the Following Reason" PM.
 

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,186
Reviews: 98
Joined
#11
I think it depends on circumstances. Such as I see a friend here in Philly and in NYC. I have done multiple reviews for her as she changes venues in both Philly and NYC. I have seen her at 6 different places since I met her 2 years ago. She also changes her name in Philly and NYC

The reviews are only for a visit when I saw her, and it helps she and the current spa. If I did not actually see her, a post might be made in the appropriate discussion section. Coincidentally there is usually a time lapse between reviews except for the last one where unfortunate circumstances caused her to leave a spa.
 

retired051923

Don't PM me.
Messages: 1,161
Reviews: 10
Joined
#12
Anyone is welcome to post followup and relocation reviews. Just don't expect site credit for reviewing the same person every time within the 90 days. The review isn't deleted, the thread isn't closed unless someone acts like a jackass in it. There is no penalty to Contributors other than you don't get site credit.
 

charliebrown

Review Contributor
Messages: 2,759
Reviews: 179
Joined
#15
Guys, I am telling you that I just posted a review where I marked the date based on the current day on the date and it posted a month earlier.
Some of these mistakes could just be a horrible interface.
 
Top