AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Is BBFS safe?

Status
Not open for further replies.

VRgamer

Review Contributor
Messages: 117
Reviews: 6
Joined
#81
", you need a psych evaluation "

-often a technique people use to get the other person angry. Saying that the person is himself personally flawed. It is an attack on the person, and not the argument content itself. Basically, a school bully calling you a "dirty head", to make you angry.


"Fine. I am wrong and you are right. You win! "

-Trying to reframe the situation as this person against the world, that we are trying to gang up on him, that he is the victim. When all we are doing is asking him to reflect on his actions and be more considerate that his words do not wrongfully stereotype others.


"We are literally here to talk about Korean pussy and you are over here acting like we are in life or death political debate. "

-Typical of him to try to increase the "drama" level of the conversation, trying to accuse others of making it a "life or death" situation, when we are just discussing the disruptive nature of his actions on this board.

Remember, this is the same guy who wrote:

"I personally enjoy reading drama. Drama is pretty fun in life."


Personally, I want to move on from this. I just want all of us to focus on talking about girls. Just please refrain from nonstop spamming of one-liners. Ask yourself before you send a message: does it help anyone pick a girl that matches his preference? If not, avoid sending it.
 

Koondog

Review Contributor
Messages: 5,281
Reviews: 27
Joined
#83
All things come to an end. But the US has the least corruption.

1. Russia took telegram from the creator
2. China’s real estate developers are so corrupt that they develop unsafe buildings that collapse

Extractive institutions I hear cannot be self-maintained.

These empire fell because they put some people above the law.
"the US has the least corruption."

Yeah I used to think that too. Get a good look at our government lately? It's a government run by leftist elites FOR leftist elites, in bed with leftist corrupt big tech corporations. The last 3 years or so have shattered any illusions I had about the US being some shining example.of virtue for the world to emulate. With the oligarchy we have now we're barely better than some 3rd world dictatorship with all the corrupt incompetents we have in positions of power. It's really embarrassing and a total disgrace.
 

mxpsdfkpodsfpko

Registered Member
Messages: 479
Reviews: 4
Joined
#84
"the US has the least corruption."

Yeah I used to think that too. Get a good look at our government lately? It's a government run by leftist elites FOR leftist elites, in bed with leftist corrupt big tech corporations. The last 3 years or so have shattered any illusions I had about the US being some shining example.of virtue for the world to emulate. With the oligarchy we have now we're barely better than some 3rd world dictatorship with all the corrupt incompetents we have in positions of power. It's really embarrassing and a total disgrace.
You need to take a step back and consider the purpose of the US. This is a country driven by capitalism and it does an exceptional job at it. I know that the tree I plant on my farm is truly mine.

You are right. Joe Biden’s son’s laptop was really funny.

The UK is a great place because of universe health care but they have said fuck it to the wind and rely on the US for everything.
 

sexyloser

K-Girl Geek
Messages: 339
Reviews: 3
Joined
#86
"the US has the least corruption."

Yeah I used to think that too. Get a good look at our government lately? It's a government run by leftist elites FOR leftist elites, in bed with leftist corrupt big tech corporations. The last 3 years or so have shattered any illusions I had about the US being some shining example.of virtue for the world to emulate. With the oligarchy we have now we're barely better than some 3rd world dictatorship with all the corrupt incompetents we have in positions of power. It's really embarrassing and a total disgrace.
I won't shut you down immediately with keep politics off the thread in the interest of not appearing to take sides, so I'll say something: the entire political environment has been corrupt since the 80's and 90's. All the politicians in power back then are still in their damn seats today, many of them are even from the same class in law school. Post-WW2~70's we still had a government that would place country before party and make needed law changes that are for the greater good of the country, now both sides are placing party before country. It's not a leftist or rightest thing, you can always find something to dislike about any one. The entire political environment is messed up right now.

I can honestly expand on that even further, but now that I have hopefully shown I'm not here to take political sides and shut one side down or the other, can we all stop talking about politics? It's not even tangentially related to the thread nor the purpose of this forum any more. Let's just stop and zip it on the political topics.
 

AutomaticSlim

Shush...
Messages: 6,928
Reviews: 133
Joined
#88
I can honestly expand on that even further, but now that I have hopefully shown I'm not here to take political sides and shut one side down or the other, can we all stop talking about politics? It's not even tangentially related to the thread nor the purpose of this forum any more. Let's just stop and zip it on the political topics.
I totally agree with the above.
And the only reason I piped up on this thread was because of the comment about "racism".
I've been to Korea 4 times.
It is absolutely NOT a racist country and they are absolutely NOT a racist people.
They don't beat, rob, rape, carjack or home invade other people because of their race. And they don't riot or loot or intimidate other people because of their race.
The only racism is violent crime and property theft against those of another race.
And that is virtually non-existent in Korea.
Anything else is merely freedom of association.
And that is a God give right.
 

mxpsdfkpodsfpko

Registered Member
Messages: 479
Reviews: 4
Joined
#89
I totally agree with the above.
And the only reason I piped up on this thread was because of the comment about "racism".
I've been to Korea 4 times.
It is absolutely NOT a racist country and they are absolutely NOT a racist people.
They don't beat, rob, rape, carjack or home invade other people because of their race. And they don't riot or loot or intimidate other people because of their race.
The only racism is violent crime and property theft against those of another race.
And that is virtually non-existent in Korea.
Anything else is merely freedom of association.
And that is a God give right.
Sounds like it is very similar to Japan. All this talk is getting me horny and I want to make another appointment.
 

superman12379

Review Contributor
Messages: 328
Reviews: 20
Joined
#90
Politics, politics, politics, politics, politics.
Yes. The Roman Senate.
The Roman Senate is the best legislature that money can buy.
It starts with the peddlers. They bribe an assemblyman,
who bribes a councilman, who bribes a senator...
It goes all the way up to the emperor!
Shit!
Kill him.
 

bonerhope

pecker_wood, thomasbird, Pay4, Pete2, Ppipe, Homas
Messages: 543
Reviews: 16
Joined
#91
You actually have a better understanding and characterization than me, that he needs the attention and feels more in control by creating conflict and drama. I'm actually a late learner about understanding social communication for wierd psychological reasons, I won't go into.

But yeah everyone wants attention and to feel in control. The social norm is that you should get attention and feeling in control in a constructive way or beneficial to the audience. However, it's easiest to get attention and control with misinformation that triggers negative feelings (like Fox News). If it's been successful for awhile it's hard to change.

There is this denial frozen bad behavior thing where denial from bad feelings about the behavior gets in the way of understanding and change. It's difficult to change behavior if stressed about it. The denial is often not conscious, and if not conscious, it's difficult to change or be consciously aware in detail of why behaving badly. Mr. T. selfish champion of misinformation is classic example.
There is a key concept that a lot of the feelings like feeling in control or needing attention are not conscious or apparent when the feelings are satisfied, rather it's the absence of sufficient control will feel scary like car skidding on black ice, or lack of attention which might make a person feel completely disconnected, alone.

These negative feelings of absence will drive automatic behaviors to satisfy them. When a behavior reduces the bad feeling of lack of control that behavior is automatically reinforced. Similarly, anything that reduces the bad feeling of need for attention will also be reinforced.

That and the internal conscious understanding looks different than the external.
Don't just pick on FOX news. I watch 'em all CNN, MSNBC etc.. and they're all full of mis info /BS IMO. And I'm an Independent so don't play favorites and certainly not a partisan hack. Also better to keep politics off this forum, remember why we're all here....FOR PUSSY.
My apologies for wandering into the political.
 

darky0475

Review Contributor
Messages: 17
Reviews: 4
Joined
#92
I didn't read through the whole thread, so apologies in advance. My input on the matter is that solid information on the riskiness of unprotected sex is based on all types of things. Most of stuff information online is generalizations. There doesn't seem to be any particular numbers or percentages or anything. Just some generalizations that some acts are riskier than others.

There was a situation where I engaged in unprotected sex in the heat of the moment without really having a really upfront and clear conversation. After asking about it later, I wasn't really assured by the answer. There's no clear-cut answers online as to the exact risk levels. Eventually, I made the decision to go get tested just to make sure. Honestly... it was a little nerve-wrecking.

Anyways... got a full panel done. Had to waiting a week to 10 days for all the results to come in and it was a little nerve-wrecking. Some stuff is treatable. Others stuff isn't. Some stuff is immediately noticeable, while other stuff is only detected by tests. Just something to take into account before you engage in unprotected sex. If you get worried about this type stuff as much as I do, maybe it be better to not partake in the riskier scenarios.

Last thing, the out-of-pocket price for a full panel is like $800. With insurance, it's quite a bit less. But having clear conversation, or using protection, or managing your risk hardly costs anything. Just my two cents.
 

sexyloser

K-Girl Geek
Messages: 339
Reviews: 3
Joined
#93
Last thing, the out-of-pocket price for a full panel is like $800. With insurance, it's quite a bit less. But having clear conversation, or using protection, or managing your risk hardly costs anything. Just my two cents.
I got my 10-panel from STDCheck.com couple times now and its only $139. Never asked for insurance info and its discreet. Somethings can't be detected by tests for 3-4 months in your body which is why the standard recommendation is test every 3 months even if you don't have symptoms. (Obviously see your physician right away when you have symptoms and they'll probably give you a swab test which is more reliable than antigen tests depending on the std)
 

darky0475

Review Contributor
Messages: 17
Reviews: 4
Joined
#94
I got my 10-panel from STDCheck.com couple times now and its only $139. Never asked for insurance info and its discreet. Somethings can't be detected by tests for 3-4 months in your body which is why the standard recommendation is test every 3 months even if you don't have symptoms. (Obviously see your physician right away when you have symptoms and they'll probably give you a swab test which is more reliable than antigen tests depending on the std)
Yeah. I should probably put in there that I went to a clinic where they drew blood and collected urine. I don't recall or know the difference in test or services. I just remember being sticker shocked when I got the bill. When I filled in the insurance information, it ended up being quite a bit less. Probably the lab trying to milk money where they can.
 

sexyloser

K-Girl Geek
Messages: 339
Reviews: 3
Joined
#95
Yeah. I should probably put in there that I went to a clinic where they drew blood and collected urine. I don't recall or know the difference in test or services. I just remember being sticker shocked when I got the bill. When I filled in the insurance information, it ended up being quite a bit less. Probably the lab trying to milk money where they can.
Ya its standard. If you actually paid with insurance they will report more on the cost. This is why all hospitals and clinics refuse to tell you the price until after you give them insurance and their so-called chargemaster will manipulate the system with the insurance. IME usually the smaller clinics will work out a cheaper code if they know you don't have insurance and its a totally different price. but other times you're SOL and insurance becomes tax on the poor and trap them with debt. It's a fucked up system really. My dad was pretty furious when he learned the hospital claimed $600 for wearing their gown and the hospital staff was like don't worry insurance will pay all of it and my dad being a pretty honest and legit person was still pissed ranting about it all month. The whole system is fucked up.

Its fun to read your insurance claim statements sometimes. I've learned a lot of seemingly legit doctors/doctor+wife team clinics all gaming the system milking money with double claims or upgraded claims for things I didn't ask for but in return they don't collect co-pay from me. Helps when you have good insurance policy with unlimited claims, too.
 

bonerhope

pecker_wood, thomasbird, Pay4, Pete2, Ppipe, Homas
Messages: 543
Reviews: 16
Joined
#96
I don't think it was a randomly chosen target at all. Tucker Carlson had such high ratings because so many of his haters would watch in order to attempt to find ways to chink his armor.


I once dated a South Korean (civi). She herself was not racist, but she told me some things about her parents, and other people in their community. Wow. Racist.
I apologize again for triggering political and broader racist discussion.

I appreciate VRgamer's support, but anonajohn is right, I did pick Fox and Tucker Carlson on purpose, but my bad for straying into misinformation in politics from misinformation about N Koreans doing bbfs. I would love to argue misinformation in politics, but agree this is not the place. You can dm me.

Thanks, for your story told about how racist the Korean parents and community which I believe. My concern being a white dude is I don't want to disrespect kgirls by being obliviously racist or culturally offensive. And, I wouldn't expect them to tell me if I was even if they spoke good English...
 

bonerhope

pecker_wood, thomasbird, Pay4, Pete2, Ppipe, Homas
Messages: 543
Reviews: 16
Joined
#97
I didn't read through the whole thread, so apologies in advance. My input on the matter is that solid information on the riskiness of unprotected sex is based on all types of things. Most of stuff information online is generalizations. There doesn't seem to be any particular numbers or percentages or anything. Just some generalizations that some acts are riskier than others.

There was a situation where I engaged in unprotected sex in the heat of the moment without really having a really upfront and clear conversation. After asking about it later, I wasn't really assured by the answer. There's no clear-cut answers online as to the exact risk levels. Eventually, I made the decision to go get tested just to make sure. Honestly... it was a little nerve-wrecking.

Anyways... got a full panel done. Had to waiting a week to 10 days for all the results to come in and it was a little nerve-wrecking. Some stuff is treatable. Others stuff isn't. Some stuff is immediately noticeable, while other stuff is only detected by tests. Just something to take into account before you engage in unprotected sex. If you get worried about this type stuff as much as I do, maybe it be better to not partake in the riskier scenarios.

Last thing, the out-of-pocket price for a full panel is like $800. With insurance, it's quite a bit less. But having clear conversation, or using protection, or managing your risk hardly costs anything. Just my two cents.
The thread on PrEP and PEP has some risk info, like failure rate of condoms is several times higher than PrEP.
 

Anonajohn

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,977
Reviews: 87
Joined
#98
I totally agree with the above.
And the only reason I piped up on this thread was because of the comment about "racism".
I've been to Korea 4 times.
It is absolutely NOT a racist country and they are absolutely NOT a racist people.
They don't beat, rob, rape, carjack or home invade other people because of their race. And they don't riot or loot or intimidate other people because of their race.
The only racism is violent crime and property theft against those of another race.
And that is virtually non-existent in Korea.
Anything else is merely freedom of association.
And that is a God give right.
I don't want to get into a debate about it but you're confusing racist violence with actual racism. When parents tell their daughter "If you date this-or-that kind of person, we will disown you", for example, based on skin color, that is the definition of racism. I won't say anything more on this topic
 

AutomaticSlim

Shush...
Messages: 6,928
Reviews: 133
Joined
#99
I don't want to get into a debate about it but you're confusing racist violence with actual racism. When parents tell their daughter "If you date this-or-that kind of person, we will disown you", for example, based on skin color, that is the definition of racism. I won't say anything more on this topic
Ok, but I TOTALLY DISAGREE.
Opinions are not intrusive on other peoples lives.
Criminal violence is.
People are allowed to have their own thoughts.
They are NOT ALLOWED to physically infringe upon others.
Not picking up someone in a taxi, or not renting an apt. to someone, or not hiring them for a job, is NOT a big deal. It's nothing really. In fact it's our God given right.
Maming, raping or killing someone is a big deal. It's evil and should be punished to the fullest extent (I would say death).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top