-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Anything on new LSC Luna and Kori?
- Thread starter Pete2
- Start date
I
Shoot me but I’m kicking the tires w ampreviews for 1-2 months so havent subscribed i.e. offer reviews but heres notes from my session w Kori. Im not 100% convinced the pics are her or they’re heavily PS but she is pretty w long black hair and ample lips. She has a very nice tight slim body and her butt is real nice to hold. Has MM but was a nat B so nice mix. No English & no translator. She’s 21, 5’1, jet black waist length hair, shy and submissive. I had to coax her into positions incl shower routine so her repertoire is limited. Its clear shes new to this and could use some positive experiences. For those who enjoy super newbies or giving training & tips she’s the perfect student. If you want sophisticated tigers you need to wait awhile. Hope you receive this in the spirit intended. Thx
Shoot me but I’m kicking the tires w ampreviews for 1-2 months so havent subscribed i.e. offer reviews but heres notes from my session w Kori. Im not 100% convinced the pics are her or they’re heavily PS but she is pretty w long black hair and ample lips. She has a very nice tight slim body and her butt is real nice to hold. Has MM but was a nat B so nice mix. No English & no translator. She’s 21, 5’1, jet black waist length hair, shy and submissive. I had to coax her into positions incl shower routine so her repertoire is limited. Its clear shes new to this and could use some positive experiences. For those who enjoy super newbies or giving training & tips she’s the perfect student. If you want sophisticated tigers you need to wait awhile. Hope you receive this in the spirit intended. Thx
I know i know. All i can say is she is young, worst case 23-24 (im a bit older so a might be off) but she has no stretch marks, no flab at all, she has a gentle small waist to medium hip ratio so not MILF-ish frame) A very petite frame maybe 95lbs at thee most. Certainly light enough to hold off the ground (part of my routine and why i like smaller providers). The room has mirrors: 3 at the foot of the bed and one to the side so lots of views of her body. Im sure the younger more experienced guys’ assessment would shed more light but shes not on my list to repeat. Ive been w the Jellas and other shapely +30s and definitely understand the 40’s comment. She isnt in that age category. Happy to answer qs. Im as fair and honest as i can be.
I do agree that too many reviews don't have useful negative info used to exclude a candidate, things like stomach fat thickness whether it's loose or firm, hangs well or pooches, whether there is butt waist curve, thick or thin, shape and feel of boobs.
But, I think most, but not all of shill looking reviews are due to the extreme positive distortion caused by a good sexual experience. Basically, if the overall experience is good, all critical characteristics are forgotten or overlooked. Even the looks of a provider often consciously gets better, after excellent service. (This has happened to me, and I've seen it mentioned in reviews.)
A monger is more likely to write a review, the better his experience.
This is evidenced by the best new providers to try are the ones with the most reviews in the first 1-2 months. This stat is more reliable than the individual review content or review rating.
The converse is that poor experiences are typically not reviewed (but will be commented on). Mongers don't want to brag about a bad experience, about how they felt burned, how they got fooled by overly positive reviews. Also, they are commonly reluctant to criticise a provider, turning off mongers who would otherwise like her. Most mongers feel responsible to not unfairly judge a provider negatively. Conversely, they don't want to get conned about young age, especially with asians that look 10 years younger. So, over reporting age is safer.
Consequently, bragging about good sex and not writing about blowing $280 on bad sex, causes positive biases in reviews that is practically indistinguishable from shilling.
The way to write a good review is to include detail that mongers comment on. My review
What's Kori's MM tits like? Are they firm or soft? Do the have under boob scars or saline with bag put in armpit? Are they round or tear drop, cone, wide or narrow, etc. Maybe a google image they look like?
But, I think most, but not all of shill looking reviews are due to the extreme positive distortion caused by a good sexual experience. Basically, if the overall experience is good, all critical characteristics are forgotten or overlooked. Even the looks of a provider often consciously gets better, after excellent service. (This has happened to me, and I've seen it mentioned in reviews.)
A monger is more likely to write a review, the better his experience.
This is evidenced by the best new providers to try are the ones with the most reviews in the first 1-2 months. This stat is more reliable than the individual review content or review rating.
The converse is that poor experiences are typically not reviewed (but will be commented on). Mongers don't want to brag about a bad experience, about how they felt burned, how they got fooled by overly positive reviews. Also, they are commonly reluctant to criticise a provider, turning off mongers who would otherwise like her. Most mongers feel responsible to not unfairly judge a provider negatively. Conversely, they don't want to get conned about young age, especially with asians that look 10 years younger. So, over reporting age is safer.
Consequently, bragging about good sex and not writing about blowing $280 on bad sex, causes positive biases in reviews that is practically indistinguishable from shilling.
The way to write a good review is to include detail that mongers comment on. My review
What's Kori's MM tits like? Are they firm or soft? Do the have under boob scars or saline with bag put in armpit? Are they round or tear drop, cone, wide or narrow, etc. Maybe a google image they look like?
I can second most of handsfree's observations except the age. It seems pretty doubtful that she's early 20s, and I'll place a very large bet she's not 21. That said, she's the most youthful provider I've seen since Angela left town (after Tina left town) and she was delightful. Try to make a good joke, because her squinting smile is highly cute.
Saw Kori yesterday and she is indeed one of youngest provider in the area. However with youth comes inexperience. She is attractive and around 5ft and at most 90 to 95 lbs. Tight body, cute bottom and MM which appear too large for her skinny frame. She doesn't have a routine and will follow your lead. She is a little shy but opens up once she is comfortable. She is a willing partner that I think many will like just don't go in expecting high level of service. She is more GFE in attitude and appears to have sweet personality.