Thanks. I know I'm coming off a bit skeptical but as you see on this website, a lot of people claiming women are younger when they are in fact a lot older. Most of the reviews are shills. Appreciate the info nonetheless.
I do agree that too many reviews don't have useful negative info used to exclude a candidate, things like stomach fat thickness whether it's loose or firm, hangs well or pooches, whether there is butt waist curve, thick or thin, shape and feel of boobs.
But, I think most, but not all of shill looking reviews are due to the extreme positive distortion caused by a good sexual experience. Basically, if the overall experience is good, all critical characteristics are forgotten or overlooked. Even the looks of a provider often consciously gets better, after excellent service. (This has happened to me, and I've seen it mentioned in reviews.)
A monger is more likely to write a review, the better his experience.
This is evidenced by the best new providers to try are the ones with the most reviews in the first 1-2 months. This stat is more reliable than the individual review content or review rating.
The converse is that poor experiences are typically not reviewed (but will be commented on). Mongers don't want to brag about a bad experience, about how they felt burned, how they got fooled by overly positive reviews. Also, they are commonly reluctant to criticise a provider, turning off mongers who would otherwise like her. Most mongers feel responsible to not unfairly judge a provider negatively. Conversely, they don't want to get conned about young age, especially with asians that look 10 years younger. So, over reporting age is safer.
Consequently, bragging about good sex and not writing about blowing $280 on bad sex, causes positive biases in reviews that is practically indistinguishable from shilling.
The way to write a good review is to include detail that mongers comment on. My review
I
Shoot me but I’m kicking the tires w ampreviews for 1-2 months so havent subscribed i.e. offer reviews but heres notes from my session w Kori. Im not 100% convinced the pics are her or they’re heavily PS but she is pretty w long black hair and ample lips. She has a very nice tight slim body and her butt is real nice to hold. Has MM but was a nat B so nice mix. No English & no translator. She’s 21, 5’1, jet black waist length hair, shy and submissive. I had to coax her into positions incl shower routine so her repertoire is limited. Its clear shes new to this and could use some positive experiences. For those who enjoy super newbies or giving training & tips she’s the perfect student. If you want sophisticated tigers you need to wait awhile. Hope you receive this in the spirit intended. Thx
What's Kori's MM tits like? Are they firm or soft? Do the have under boob scars or saline with bag put in armpit? Are they round or tear drop, cone, wide or narrow, etc. Maybe a google image they look like?