AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Well it finally happened...

dakidkicks

Registered Member
Messages: 79
Reviews: 10
Joined
#1
Was done and about to leave when the girl told me to wait because there was a police car outside. Waited inside the room hoping they would leave but instead they came knocking on the door. Made me come out and questioned me. Halfway through i realized my pants were inside out.. They had me wait for about an hour outside. At the end they took my pic and let me go. They said I'll be getting a letter in the mail if the DA decides to prosecute or not. I'm done with this hobby for good. This was in SSF at a hotel/motel.
 

mars1975

Registered Member
Messages: 1
Joined
#4
How did they make you come outside? Once, the police knocked on the door when I was in an K-org apartment, but we didn't answer and kept quiet. They left.
 

dakidkicks

Registered Member
Messages: 79
Reviews: 10
Joined
#7
Asked me if I know her, then they were like we know she's a hooker your pants are inside out come on man lol. So i was like fuck they got me so i just told them i saw the ad online, called and came over here. paid her $120 for 30 min. They asked me if I knew the operator and stuff like that but I don't so they were like ok and then questioned her. They got the other guy and girl in the other room too.
 

dakidkicks

Registered Member
Messages: 79
Reviews: 10
Joined
#8
funny thing is that I got there earlier and got b&s so I passed on the first girl and said id wait for the one I saw. had I just seen the first one I would've been gone by the time they arrived.
 

AZ2CA

Registered Member
Messages: 6
Reviews: 1
Joined
#11
Asked me if I know her, then they were like we know she's a hooker your pants are inside out come on man lol. So i was like fuck they got me so i just told them i saw the ad online, called and came over here. paid her $120 for 30 min. They asked me if I knew the operator and stuff like that but I don't so they were like ok and then questioned her. They got the other guy and girl in the other room too.
As a reminder, even if they say that they know, it's best not to say anything and to deny everything. The burden of proof is on them so if you don't say anything then you're much better off.
 

PuppyOso

Review Contributor
Messages: 75
Reviews: 4
Joined
#15
There’s nothing illegal with 2 consenting adults spending time together.



There’s also nothing illegal with meeting strangers online and hanging out with them.



There’s also nothing illegal with giving charitable donations to people.



There’s also nothing illegal with paying someone to spend time with you.



There’s also nothing illegal with wearing your pants inside out.



2 consenting adults have a reasonable expectation to privacy in their hotel room, condo, house, or behind a locked door in a massage parlor.



None of that is illegal.



I would not approve of illegal activities such as negotiating a money for sexual acts transaction. Negotiating a monetary transaction for sex is illegal.
 

PuppyOso

Review Contributor
Messages: 75
Reviews: 4
Joined
#18
Unless you are driving a motor vehicle, lawfully detained for investigative purposes, or under arrest; you are not legally required to provide your identification.

As soon as the officer interacts with you or asks you any questions, you are well within your rights to ask, “am I free to leave?”

You weren’t driving and you weren’t under arrest.

The office could lawfully detain you while he/she performed an investigation if they have reasonable suspicion you were involved a crime. Reasonable suspicion has a lower standard than probable cause.

If the officer has reasonable suspicion you were involved in a crime, you could be lawfully detained and you could be obligated to provide identification when asked. You may also be frisked and handcuffed for the safety of the officer. While being frisked, your phone may be removed from your pocket but reasonable suspicion is not grounds to search the phone.

The officer investigation should find the following:
  • You make poor wardrobe decisions
  • You were with a friend at a hotel
The officer would know those are likely outcomes of the investigation, are not crimes, and may choose to not waste their time.

But, he/she would also know that you or the female might forfeit or waive your 4th amendment rights:
  • I paid her for sex
  • He paid me for sex
Assuming neither you nor the female waive or forfeit your rights, the basis of the reasonable suspicion is no longer valid based on the outcome of the investigation. If the reasonable suspicion was still in place, it would apply to all tenants, guests, and visitors to the hotel. It doesn’t because that is the intent of the hotel establishment and hospitality industry.


In real life, none of this would happen because you and the female would know you were not legally obligated to open the door.
 

DDD1977

Registered Member
Messages: 42
Reviews: 1
Joined
#20
Unless you are driving a motor vehicle, lawfully detained for investigative purposes, or under arrest; you are not legally required to provide your identification.

As soon as the officer interacts with you or asks you any questions, you are well within your rights to ask, “am I free to leave?”

You weren’t driving and you weren’t under arrest.

The office could lawfully detain you while he/she performed an investigation if they have reasonable suspicion you were involved a crime. Reasonable suspicion has a lower standard than probable cause.

If the officer has reasonable suspicion you were involved in a crime, you could be lawfully detained and you could be obligated to provide identification when asked. You may also be frisked and handcuffed for the safety of the officer. While being frisked, your phone may be removed from your pocket but reasonable suspicion is not grounds to search the phone.

The officer investigation should find the following:
  • You make poor wardrobe decisions
  • You were with a friend at a hotel
The officer would know those are likely outcomes of the investigation, are not crimes, and may choose to not waste their time.

But, he/she would also know that you or the female might forfeit or waive your 4th amendment rights:
  • I paid her for sex
  • He paid me for sex
Assuming neither you nor the female waive or forfeit your rights, the basis of the reasonable suspicion is no longer valid based on the outcome of the investigation. If the reasonable suspicion was still in place, it would apply to all tenants, guests, and visitors to the hotel. It doesn’t because that is the intent of the hotel establishment and hospitality industry.


In real life, none of this would happen because you and the female would know you were not legally obligated to open the door.
You seem well versed in this arena, regarding laws. It all makes sense, thank you for taking the time to write that
 
Top