I have been thinking about the secrets we share, and the secrets we keep to ourselves.
I've noticed that the reviews on AmpReviews have gotten way, way more detailed and explicit. I learned the art of writing a review during the SH days. With SH, explicit reviews were rejected, so you often had to rely on innuendo to help the reader understand what your experience was like. I prefer the less explicit reviews, but I think I'm in the minority on AmpReviews.
Conversely, I can't recall any "no reviews" prohibitions during the SH days. Yes - there were a few deep, deep UTR places which were never reviewed. But just about every other place had a review thread, usually within days or weeks of opening. On AmpReviews, if you review a "no reviews" place, other members will probably jump on you, and your review may get deleted.
The following three examples highlight some of my thinking on which secrets to reveal, and which I should keep to myself. I'm curious what you all think. Which secrets do you keep to yourselves?
- I recently visited a new place in CNJ. It advertises aggressively, but there are no reviews yet. I'm not aware that the place has a "no reviews" policy, so I'm surprised that no one has reviewed it. Do I post a review or wait for someone else to break the ice? I'm feeling like I should post my review.
- Through intuition and luck, last month I rediscovered a well-reviewed girl with a reputation for having a very open menu. It was publicly reported on AmpReviews that she had left the area. However, she works at a "no reviews" place in CNJ. I generally don't honor "no reviews" mandates because I don't work for the spa owner, and I keep my reviews pretty tame anyway. But a review could affect this girl's continued employment. Even though I know that other guys are looking for her, I'll probably keep this one to myself.
- I often get first visit FS at places which all the reviews suggest are HE-only places. The girls say "shhh - only for you". I'm not dumb enough to think I'm the only one getting this service, but I do believe that it's the exception. Even if I have no intention of returning to the place (or seeing the same girl again), I generally keep this to myself.
I've noticed that the reviews on AmpReviews have gotten way, way more detailed and explicit. I learned the art of writing a review during the SH days. With SH, explicit reviews were rejected, so you often had to rely on innuendo to help the reader understand what your experience was like. I prefer the less explicit reviews, but I think I'm in the minority on AmpReviews.
Conversely, I can't recall any "no reviews" prohibitions during the SH days. Yes - there were a few deep, deep UTR places which were never reviewed. But just about every other place had a review thread, usually within days or weeks of opening. On AmpReviews, if you review a "no reviews" place, other members will probably jump on you, and your review may get deleted.
The following three examples highlight some of my thinking on which secrets to reveal, and which I should keep to myself. I'm curious what you all think. Which secrets do you keep to yourselves?
- I recently visited a new place in CNJ. It advertises aggressively, but there are no reviews yet. I'm not aware that the place has a "no reviews" policy, so I'm surprised that no one has reviewed it. Do I post a review or wait for someone else to break the ice? I'm feeling like I should post my review.
- Through intuition and luck, last month I rediscovered a well-reviewed girl with a reputation for having a very open menu. It was publicly reported on AmpReviews that she had left the area. However, she works at a "no reviews" place in CNJ. I generally don't honor "no reviews" mandates because I don't work for the spa owner, and I keep my reviews pretty tame anyway. But a review could affect this girl's continued employment. Even though I know that other guys are looking for her, I'll probably keep this one to myself.
- I often get first visit FS at places which all the reviews suggest are HE-only places. The girls say "shhh - only for you". I'm not dumb enough to think I'm the only one getting this service, but I do believe that it's the exception. Even if I have no intention of returning to the place (or seeing the same girl again), I generally keep this to myself.