That's partially true. All recordings can be used in a court of law under specific circumstances. For instance if someone was arrested for going to Lucky's and ended up in court. If the person disputed that they went there, a video recording without permission could be provided as evidence to prove perjury.
-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Sketchy activity outside lucky’s
- Thread starter Markliu
- Start date
Ok, no. This is also incorrect. Look at California penal code section 632. What you are talking about is relating to the due process and the criminal rules of evidence. There are certainly ways to get video into evidence, but if that video was taken in violation of California law? Good luck.
it’s a little complicated but as a constitutional argument, it is akin to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine found in Miranda.
it’s a little complicated but as a constitutional argument, it is akin to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine found in Miranda.
Just to clarify when I say “into evidence” impeachment evidence does not get lodged as evidence in any event. It can only be used to create doubt about the witnesses credibility. This video evidence would also likely be way too prejudicial against its probative value anyways, so it’s not getting in anywhere imo.
Because Google is a for profit company that monetizes its products.
Google maps cars used to scan millions of cars for street view. That are then seen by anyone who uses a street view.
Think about it this way. If it was illegal to record license plates wouldnt all the dashcam footage be blurred?
A license plate is intrinsically public information. It exists to identity a car in public. It exists exactly for purposes such if you see someone commit a crime in it you can identify the car.
There is no law forbidding public filming of a public place, especially for private use. A parking spot is public, the license plate is public, and so forth.
I'm not defending that nutjob at all btw.. just trying to make things straight that recording a public place and publicly visible info on a personal cell phone, is not illegal. You may get your ass kicked, but not by uncle Sam and the justice system.
Google maps cars used to scan millions of cars for street view. That are then seen by anyone who uses a street view.
Think about it this way. If it was illegal to record license plates wouldnt all the dashcam footage be blurred?
A license plate is intrinsically public information. It exists to identity a car in public. It exists exactly for purposes such if you see someone commit a crime in it you can identify the car.
There is no law forbidding public filming of a public place, especially for private use. A parking spot is public, the license plate is public, and so forth.
I'm not defending that nutjob at all btw.. just trying to make things straight that recording a public place and publicly visible info on a personal cell phone, is not illegal. You may get your ass kicked, but not by uncle Sam and the justice system.
Best to just ignore the nutcase. His tactic seems to rely on shaming you.
I'd wear a mask. And park away like I almost always do. If he's 60+ and I see a weirdo follow me to my car across the block after Ive exited... I'd turn the jets on and see how well he runs while holding the camera. Obviously not an option for older gentlemen.
In some other illegal enterprises he'd just get his candy ass beat and his camera/phone taken/broken
I'd wear a mask. And park away like I almost always do. If he's 60+ and I see a weirdo follow me to my car across the block after Ive exited... I'd turn the jets on and see how well he runs while holding the camera. Obviously not an option for older gentlemen.
In some other illegal enterprises he'd just get his candy ass beat and his camera/phone taken/broken
Dude, I went by today and by the time I left, they had people fucking everywhere, and I mean everywhere. All the rooms were taken, plus they had someone in the hallway (which was closed off). I had to go out the back gate, and even there, there was an 80 year old monger with Honey. He didn't have his dick out yet, but I can't say I wasn't curious how it was going to go down with him at that age.
Funny discussion. Checked this place out recently to see for myself. Lots of parking lot traffic but no amateur photographer busy bodies. Door opened before I reached it and greeted by one milf hottie, but he gaggle of gals on the couches all held blankets over their heads? WTF? Is that normal? I only assumed that it was my greeters turn in rotation and they are blocking themselves as options.