Hey everyone! I am extremely new to this and so far have only seen Binna at Sexyhouse. LSC girls look hot but LSC P.O. is asking for Drivers License and Work ID. Is it worth giving this information and what has everyone’s experience been with such screening? Just concerned about giving away such files on text. Thanks
-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Screening Process Doubt
- Thread starter SithWarrior
- Start date
Based on reviews, it sounds like LSC has a solid lineup of talent. But, I haven’t tasted. I have a prominent job in a somewhat public position. So, it is not worth the risk for me to send that stuff. I’m very satisfied with talents from other orgs. Lots of orgs don’t require this info, but I have been around a few years and may have lucked out on the very light screening for most orgs. Up to you to determine if it is worth the risk of sending out this information. But, if your are in these forums, I know your small head is yelling louder than your big head.
Yes, it is worth it. Screening fears that the org will out you so far don't seem justified.
There is a unresolvable conflict between your desire to be anonymous which makes you feel safe, but also makes providers unsafe. Anonymous guys are statistically more likely to violate providers and not follow rules which jeopardizes the organization. Even previously well behaved guys will sometimes violate women if they think themselves anonymous and no one watching.
LSC had to shutdown their San Mateo operation a few years ago supposedly because of stupid monger behaviour. Notice their page of rules - Candy101.
Your current drivers license and work ID, means that you are gainfully employed and sociably responsible, unlikely to be violent, or break rules, and non anonymous.
The picture is most important to tell who's at door. At new orgs who know I'm good long time monger, they will ask what I'm wearing, hair color (they already know age & ethnicity).
Your reluctance to pony up this info is not a mark against you, but is a sign you won't misbehave. Eventually, guys pony up this info when the little head overcomes the big head's fears. Also, it's OK to ask what info you can leave off, or half cover up on ids. But, enough work id needs to match dl.
There has been a lot of discussion of this recurring issue on ampreviews. Search for qualifying. It's appears to be very low risk.
Financial ID theft - most of that info is already out there, but your best defense is to put credit freezes on your account at all three credit agencies which is what I do.
Getting outed to significant other is more likely due to your own actions, like mixing up texting if not using separate burner, or burner getting discovered. If your other is suspicious, she can stick a magnetic gps tracker tracker on your car, personally track you, etc.
Finally, I think you should mention that you've seen Binna x times at sexyhouse. PO's don't say what all the qualifying rules to keep new guys from gaming the system. I think they might check on you with sexyhouse PO, but will deny it. The other thing that seems to commonly happen is an org doesn't let you in first time, but will let you in 2 months later. This happened to me with BGC despite being long time monger.
There is a unresolvable conflict between your desire to be anonymous which makes you feel safe, but also makes providers unsafe. Anonymous guys are statistically more likely to violate providers and not follow rules which jeopardizes the organization. Even previously well behaved guys will sometimes violate women if they think themselves anonymous and no one watching.
LSC had to shutdown their San Mateo operation a few years ago supposedly because of stupid monger behaviour. Notice their page of rules - Candy101.
Your current drivers license and work ID, means that you are gainfully employed and sociably responsible, unlikely to be violent, or break rules, and non anonymous.
The picture is most important to tell who's at door. At new orgs who know I'm good long time monger, they will ask what I'm wearing, hair color (they already know age & ethnicity).
Your reluctance to pony up this info is not a mark against you, but is a sign you won't misbehave. Eventually, guys pony up this info when the little head overcomes the big head's fears. Also, it's OK to ask what info you can leave off, or half cover up on ids. But, enough work id needs to match dl.
There has been a lot of discussion of this recurring issue on ampreviews. Search for qualifying. It's appears to be very low risk.
Financial ID theft - most of that info is already out there, but your best defense is to put credit freezes on your account at all three credit agencies which is what I do.
Getting outed to significant other is more likely due to your own actions, like mixing up texting if not using separate burner, or burner getting discovered. If your other is suspicious, she can stick a magnetic gps tracker tracker on your car, personally track you, etc.
Finally, I think you should mention that you've seen Binna x times at sexyhouse. PO's don't say what all the qualifying rules to keep new guys from gaming the system. I think they might check on you with sexyhouse PO, but will deny it. The other thing that seems to commonly happen is an org doesn't let you in first time, but will let you in 2 months later. This happened to me with BGC despite being long time monger.
Can you show these stats? Or is this your assumption?
What will stop a verified customer from pulling the same stunt as the stupid monger? LSC claims that they don't save customers info so they'll have no leverage; unless they are lying and they are actually saving the info.
Unlikely to be violent? Or break rules? Really? Again this is your assumption? I do agree that it shows you are gainfully employed but it doesn't even prove you can afford the session. And what about mongers who own business and work for themselves?
I certainly haven't given out my ID/DL and paystubs to any org.
A credit freeze does not guarantee safety from identity theft. If someone has access to information pertaining to your accounts that are already established, they could still perform fraudulent activity.
What will stop a verified customer from pulling the same stunt as the stupid monger? LSC claims that they don't save customers info so they'll have no leverage; unless they are lying and they are actually saving the info.
Unlikely to be violent? Or break rules? Really? Again this is your assumption? I do agree that it shows you are gainfully employed but it doesn't even prove you can afford the session. And what about mongers who own business and work for themselves?
I certainly haven't given out my ID/DL and paystubs to any org.
A credit freeze does not guarantee safety from identity theft. If someone has access to information pertaining to your accounts that are already established, they could still perform fraudulent activity.
LSCs requirement are to protect their girls and probably are justified. But, for a guy who still has aspirations in their life to hold political office or any upper management position in a large public company, don’t do it. You don’t want to end up in the news like Robert Kraft or those involved when the Seattle Korgs got busted. Limit your identity being exposed as much as possible.
It's all a balance between plausible deniability, online safety, and laziness of cops.
Perfect security doesn't exist and assume orgs will have your info forever. You're literally showing up there and they can have cameras everywhere, so you have to trust them on some level to even do this. What you're trying to protect against is a data breach. If the cops get a hold of their client list, you don't want to get arrested.
So, you can show ID, but cover your name/address. Instead of work ID, have a nice photo on LinkedIn that they can compare it to. Have a burner phone. Use a self destruct image host that strips metadata to send your photo. Takes a bit longer, but generally the POs nowadays are a bit younger and understand that you want to protect your info.
At the end of the day, if your data is leaked, cops have a blurry photo with no name and a burner phone number. Even if they do somehow recognize you, you can just claim someone in a bar took a pic of your ID and is impersonating you. They'll have to get a warrant to get your phone location history, etc. 99.9999% of the time, they will be too lazy to try to find you and build a case, especially if the provider isn't going to testify.
And plan ahead on your verification, don't be expecting a quick turnaround on Saturday night, ask them on Wednesday morning or something. FWIW, LSC has been around forever and has one of the best reps; plenty of people monger just with them.
Perfect security doesn't exist and assume orgs will have your info forever. You're literally showing up there and they can have cameras everywhere, so you have to trust them on some level to even do this. What you're trying to protect against is a data breach. If the cops get a hold of their client list, you don't want to get arrested.
So, you can show ID, but cover your name/address. Instead of work ID, have a nice photo on LinkedIn that they can compare it to. Have a burner phone. Use a self destruct image host that strips metadata to send your photo. Takes a bit longer, but generally the POs nowadays are a bit younger and understand that you want to protect your info.
At the end of the day, if your data is leaked, cops have a blurry photo with no name and a burner phone number. Even if they do somehow recognize you, you can just claim someone in a bar took a pic of your ID and is impersonating you. They'll have to get a warrant to get your phone location history, etc. 99.9999% of the time, they will be too lazy to try to find you and build a case, especially if the provider isn't going to testify.
And plan ahead on your verification, don't be expecting a quick turnaround on Saturday night, ask them on Wednesday morning or something. FWIW, LSC has been around forever and has one of the best reps; plenty of people monger just with them.
I don't think the client list, or text history is adequate evidence of solicitation, since it's just evidence that you met up for a massage.
It's not LE, rather most guys want to keep their mongering secret from significant others, employers, friends, people they work with, etc. Or, like if going into politics.
It's not LE, rather most guys want to keep their mongering secret from significant others, employers, friends, people they work with, etc. Or, like if going into politics.
I think people forgetting one of the more important parts to this.
Once org has your info they can leverage it against you.
For example, if you wrote a negative review, and they figure out its you, you can get a thinly veiled threat - a "friendly" reminder that they know who you are and that they have your info.
Even if review is completely honest and true.
So, if you're planning to give glowing reviews to girls you like and not reviewing bad sessions, probably not gonna affect you.
If, on other hand, you don't hold back from writing negative reviews (whether public or in big enough private group) when you had a subpar or worse session, it's best to remain fully anonymous. Orgs choose money over truth.
Once org has your info they can leverage it against you.
For example, if you wrote a negative review, and they figure out its you, you can get a thinly veiled threat - a "friendly" reminder that they know who you are and that they have your info.
Even if review is completely honest and true.
So, if you're planning to give glowing reviews to girls you like and not reviewing bad sessions, probably not gonna affect you.
If, on other hand, you don't hold back from writing negative reviews (whether public or in big enough private group) when you had a subpar or worse session, it's best to remain fully anonymous. Orgs choose money over truth.