Saw Ms. Sunny recently and came away agreeing with both the first commenters here: her face seems milfy with a strong whiff of plastic surgery, and the tits are a typical disappointment -- OK when she's on her feet, but a shapeless mess when she's on her back. My first thought was that a lot of the early enthusiasm for her seen here was shills busy at their job.
That said, she was compliant and had a great attitude, which are the very things I found lacking in Cora (no sir to CIM) and Mila (rushing, near-frowning). If Mila could cheer up a bit, improve her BJ, and stop trying to hurry the conclusion, she'd be my first LSC choice every time for her nice round butt, hot little trim, and natural-looking tatas.
Maybe your right about Sunny's face plastic surgery, but I don't notice it. I think she's fairly cute. Her boobs I agree about being a shapeless mess on her back, but even though better when standing, I don't like her round, soft natural looking boobs. I prefer MM pointy firm self supporting ones, that you can bounce your chest.
BGC Jamie has great looking boobs when standing, but I was shocked in missionary, they went completely flat. Evidently they are saline filled bags. They put the deflated bags in through a small incision in armpit, then inflat them with a syringe. There is this common thing among mongers that soft and milfy (round, slight droop) natural is better. But young boobs tend to be firmer, flat cone shaped, and don't go flat in mish. I like SKS Joah's and LKS Adela's boobs.
Hopefully, Mila will learn to get more upbeat which helps with repeats. How long ago did you see her? Maybe it was off day since offbase likes her personality. I remember Tina in last part of her LSC stay got really perky and up beat. She would dance and sing, make jokes like say "I love you." . FCG Lizzy laughs a lot, and is easy to joke around with, but older.
There is a shill syndrome where first 2-5 reviews are overly positive for number of reasons which is why I don't like to see a provider without half a dozen reviews or reviews from known mongers.
Of course, orgs will write fake reviews in order to advertise, but these are easy to spot. LSC doesn't do this but does ask mongers on a new provider, if they had a good time, if so they ask them to write a good review. I think LSC is more interested in accurate reviews, matching provider to monger's types and desires.
The guys who toftt first, usually are more likely to be positive about anything new and different, otherwise they wouldn't be first to try. If they have a bad experience they don't review, but their positive reviews reflect relative appeal. So, I grant you, Sunny doesn't have super appealing face/body but she is popular.
Also, if a newer monger has a good service experience they tend to either not notice or will accept negative physical stuff.
There also seems that the more providers a monger fucks, the more new looks, body types they will try. It's the evolutionary drive to fuck every woman that you can.
Genghis Kahn, every day of his adult life, fucked different child bearing women - local chieftan's daughter(s), concubines, wives, etc. reason 8% of Asian men are descendents. (Google). You figure large % were ugly, and only small number were really attractive who he could have fucked exclusively, but didn't. The genetic studies imply he pretty much fucked all available women. Why?Because he could.
