And you know this how? So it is just a coincidence that every time one of the women there has been reviewed with graphic details lately they end up being let go? Another spa owner (formerly Rose Red and now Diamond) has posted on Twitter that everyone should limit the nature of the reviews of the women and should no longer refer to the spa as Rose Red. I guess you are one of the guys who fail to see that some spa owners would like some discretion to be used.
You’ve already changed your tune from your initial post…SMH…in your first post you said “Do you not read other reviews on the board about this place? ???? Every review of one of the women there has resulted in them being fired. What is wrong with you?”
It went from every review leads to one of the women being fired….NOW it is every time one of the women there has been reviewed with graphic details they end up being let go… so which is it, as you seem to know best….every review leads to termination of said employee, or every review with graphic details….I want to make sure I’ve got it right from the man blasting others for providing a review on a site that is built to provide reviews…
You do you and post where and what you want, as you see fit. Other posters will do the same, as they see fit...
If an owner doesn’t want reviews of their business, and what occurs at their business, maybe they should consider a business in a different industry. The restaurant next door could be an option. Or maybe the tax prep a door over. If you own a massage parlor that is open until 10 pm, you certainly know the business you are in and already accepted the risks associated with it. These reviews don’t change anything.
The OP certainly didn’t go into graphic detail either. There is nothing wrong with him, to answer the question you posed.