I get that there have been some things raised about Lisa, and I'm not her doc nor am I a public health pro, but I feel like we should make sure to keep some perspective. X percent of the general population has this issue. It might be reasonable to assume that 1.5X percent of the provider community would have it. And....I am just throwing this out here as a possible number...1.3X percent of serious hobbyists might also have? (again, I'm not a public health expert but I'm sharing this as a strawman).
As far was what this might mean for who we visit and who we do not visit, I guess for me the overall implication is to remember that every visit carries come risk. Some visits may carry more risk. But I think it's harder than we think to tell which visits those are.