-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Review: Lirica from Peach
- Thread starter vaginatarian
- Start date
I don’t think this review is fake, I just think this guy has a bad sense of beauty. I saw her and she is short, has natural DDs and will literally do anything (didn’t ask about Greek). I’d say she’s fairly cute but not beautiful. Definitely not in her 20s either.
She is kinda cold though until she gets into the sex.
She is kinda cold though until she gets into the sex.
My experience is that physical descriptions are overly positive and not specific. If the monger clicks with the provider and has a positive experience, there will be nothing wrong with her body. If another monger shows up and she doesn't meet his expectations, all he can see is what's wrong with her body.
I try to never see anyone without 5-6 reviews from mongers with review history, even then most of the time I don't repeat.
I try to never see anyone without 5-6 reviews from mongers with review history, even then most of the time I don't repeat.
I'm not trying to trash the subjective opinions of this reviewer (ie. "Tight, young, HOT). I am taking issue with the inclusion of specific objective measurements (ie. weight) when they are inaccurate by almost 30%.
I chose to see this RA because of those inaccurate details in *this specific review*. I don't think I'm out of line in calling out the inaccuracies after wasting my time to learn about them.
I chose to see this RA because of those inaccurate details in *this specific review*. I don't think I'm out of line in calling out the inaccuracies after wasting my time to learn about them.
Objectively speaking, there must be a shit ton of blind ppl and/or folks w cognitive disabilities on these boards; that’s not subjective or trash talking…25lb weight difference for the worse, young in her 20s = old in her 40s, tight body = flabby, list goes on…
So we should be grateful op at least got the tits right? Lmao
So we should be grateful op at least got the tits right? Lmao
Well, unfortunately, yes objectively lots of blind people. The problem with weight estimation is it's notoriously inaccurate. Also, because we can't check actual numbers, weight as a euphemism for fat becomes a highly subjective measure for body good looks; that is, thin (lower fat) = more attractive. "A woman can never be too rich or too thin.". And looks are highly subjective depending on the sexual experience.
Which brings me back to the example of Yuffie who I judge from stomach fat folds is 25lbs over fat, one of the most visibly fattest providers I've seen, but check all her reviews physical descriptiond which most clearly euphemise if even mention - full woman, thick bit of belly not fat, pudgy, etc. LSC Hera is thick, bit of belly also, but not anyway like Yuffie.
Which brings me back to the example of Yuffie who I judge from stomach fat folds is 25lbs over fat, one of the most visibly fattest providers I've seen, but check all her reviews physical descriptiond which most clearly euphemise if even mention - full woman, thick bit of belly not fat, pudgy, etc. LSC Hera is thick, bit of belly also, but not anyway like Yuffie.