AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Gorgeous slender sexy face cheerful Sugar at Gold Spa

labguy

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,035
Reviews: 168
Joined
#1
Title: Review: Gorgeous slender sexy face cheerful Sugar at Gold Spa
Date: Mar 12, 2024
Phone: (201)233-7756
City: Paterson
State: NJ
Location: McBride Ave
House Fee & Tip (if applicable) 60 plus 100
Nationality: Chinese
Age Estimate: 30s
Physical Description: Gorgeous sexy face - big eyes and mouth, v-chin, tall (5’7”), slender, hourglass figure, firm C top, meaty ass, flawless soft skin, no tattoo or scar, baby voice and cheerful

Recommendation: Yes
 

Happy Jack

Review Contributor
Messages: 3,746
Reviews: 146
Joined
#5
Actually she looks nothing like that picture in the face on the goldncoco Twitter.

She does have great tits though, and a very nice body She was Su Ge at Beyond Spa a few weeks ago. This picture is very accurate.
1000025154.jpg
 

Happy Jack

Review Contributor
Messages: 3,746
Reviews: 146
Joined
#10
Between the bad lighting and greesy face, I think that pic doesn’t do her justice. Go see her for yourself. You can always walk.
Yeah, those pictures are bullshit also. Not recent, and beauty cammed.

She has an amazing body, but let's not bullshit about her face in some of those outdated or beauty cam pics.
 

MaverickHunter

Review Contributor
Messages: 417
Reviews: 20
Joined
#13
Between the bad lighting and greesy face, I think that pic doesn’t do her justice. Go see her for yourself. You can always walk.
Bro stop with the bullshit about looks man, always hyping these girls when they look nothing like the pictures, you should be ban for just posting bullshit after bullshit review.
 

Norm75

Review Contributor
Messages: 541
Reviews: 21
Joined
#15
Bro stop with the bullshit about looks man, always hyping these girls when they look nothing like the pictures, you should be ban for just posting bullshit after bullshit review.
I don't think it's BS
To be fair... those glam shots will require a make up artist/stylist to make any girl look like that.
 

dietwater

Review Contributor
Messages: 406
Reviews: 18
Joined
#16
Bro stop with the bullshit about looks man, always hyping these girls when they look nothing like the pictures, you should be ban for just posting bullshit after bullshit review.
If lab guy closes gold , coco , 365 etc etc where would guys go for 40-50yr old Asians that do anything for the same amount of money for the last 20yrs?
 

Happy Jack

Review Contributor
Messages: 3,746
Reviews: 146
Joined
#17
I don't think it's BS
To be fair... those glam shots will require a make up artist/stylist to make any girl look like that.
They don't need makeup artist.
All they need is an app.

Sometimes the girls don't even crop the Watermark of the app out of the picture, and you can see it in one of the bottom corners.
 

MaverickHunter

Review Contributor
Messages: 417
Reviews: 20
Joined
#18
I don't think it's BS
To be fair... those glam shots will require a make up artist/stylist to make any girl look like that.
If you don’t think it’s bs then you’re naive, look at the picture that was posted here vs the one on Twitter, and also the service on this review it’s BS, not saying she’s bad but if you notice all his reviews are like the girls are amazing which is really not true lol
 

labguy

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,035
Reviews: 168
Joined
#19
For the sake of comparison, there is a sample size of three. I think it is confident to say those are from the same person with varied degrees of filtering. Rather than the classic graceful type of beauty, I used the word sexy rather than beautiful or pretty. And the highlight is more of her personality. Because we spoke the same language, I think it is useful to describe more of her personalities, interactions and overall vibe that may not be come through with language barrier. IMG_5560.jpeg
 

Happy Jack

Review Contributor
Messages: 3,746
Reviews: 146
Joined
#20
For the sake of comparison, there is a sample size of three. I think it is confident to say those are from the same person with varied degrees of filtering. Rather than the classic graceful type of beauty, I used the word sexy rather than beautiful or pretty. And the highlight is more of her personality. Because we spoke the same language, I think it is useful to describe more of her personalities, interactions and overall vibe that may not be come through with language barrier. View attachment 52584
Why are you using filters at all?
90% of the stuff you post on the Twitter pages you manage are ridiculously misleading.
 
Top