Review: Good Day - Tina

[mardana001]

Title: Review: Good Day - Tina
Date: Oct 23, 2018
Phone:
City: East Brunswick
State: NJ
Activities: CBJ, CFS
Age Estimate: 50+
Summary: My visit was good. After reading so many of you reviewed about Tina, I opted to visit her. She is good overall, but the age factor little bit killing. But she is good to spend 1 hour with. Good massage and good relief

Click to unlock the hidden Private Details in this review

Recommendation: Yes

 

[Ripple65]

What gave you that impression ?

 

[mardana001]

What gave you that impression ?

I am not sure but, may be I interrupted the flow ?!! ... To begin with, she started all bare. I immediately stopped her and told have it covered. Did't want to take any health related chances for a (stupid) 10 min enjoyment

 

[Flyfella187]

You have the number?

 

[Koondog]

What kind of bod does she have?

 

[Ellocohombre]

Koondog, search"Tina, Good Day" bunch reviews come up. Tiny spinner.

 

[Koondog]

I tried but I get 5 pages of other "Tina" reviews.

 

[Koondog]

Oh, this is May from K&W. Not looking to relive the past. Interesting that the backdoor is now on the menu though.

 

[Steelhead]

Oh, this is May from K&W. Not looking to relive the past. Interesting that the backdoor is now on the menu though.

I guess anything is possible,.....

I've known May, Tina, whatever one prefers to call her for a long time, have my doubts about her giving up the poop-shoot. Anyone who knows her knows she is smaller, skinny body type, there has never, ever been any mention previously. Additionally, why wouldn't the review in the activities heading made reference to Anal. Perhaps the reviewer meant Doggie when referring to back entrance.

In reading, starts out cowgirl, mentions back entrance, then finishing in Mish,...no mention of changing the wrapper? Obviously and if no change took place, went directly from puss-to-ass-to-puss,....ah,..if so, none for me thanks and if so,.... thanks for the heads-up.

 

[Ripple65]

You have to take the review at face value but somethings just don’t add up

 

[Koondog]

"I've known May, Tina, whatever one prefers to call her for a long time, have my doubts about her giving up the poop-shoot."

Agreed, for about a year over many sessions I asked her and the answer was always NO.

But this reviewer mentions that he tried the 'back entrance" for awhile. seems pretty straight-forward but maybe he can clarify so there is no ambiguity.

 

[Steelhead]

"I've known May, Tina, whatever one prefers to call her for a long time, have my doubts about her giving up the poop-shoot."

Agreed, for about a year over many sessions I asked her and the answer was always NO.

But this reviewer mentions that he tried the 'back entrance" for awhile. seems pretty straight-forward but maybe he can clarify so there is no ambiguity.

Hey Koon:

Straight forward is one thing and I agree with you,.... I'd like to definitely know.
It's one thing to care about one's self:
"Did't want to take any health related chances for a (stupid) 10 min enjoyment"

......but, and I know Tina's a big girl, a grown woman, makes her own decisions but what about her risks, there's no responsibility on behalf of the John?
......and what about the dude who's next up, unknowingly doing the dive after she supposedly had some shit stained, mimi-me up her cooch? I guess that's different, i guess that's ok,....

If that's how she's providing the service,.... that's fucked up,......I guess making the change would have also,... "interrupted the flow".
If the implication in the review, if the interpretation or assumption of ass thump'in is inaccurate,.....that's also not cool. Certainly not fair for her to have to defend herself, ....as I'm sure the line will be even longer, then it normally is to see her.

either way, I hope it gets clarified, for everyone's sake..

 

[chronus]

Perhaps the OP meant entered from behind (ds) and not THE back entrance?

 

[Koondog]

Let's hear from the reviewer.

 

[Matching#s]

I could be wrong, but I would tend to think he meant rear entry aka doggy, not the other. The description seemed a bit too casual for that, while being misleading at the same time. Of course, correct wording at the start or a simple clarification by the original poster would have avoided the confusion.

 

[Koondog]

He could have easily just said "doggy" but seemed to go out of way to insinuate anal with "back entrance".

 

[Koondog]

If it turns out to be just a horribly worded slip, it might just be the biggest monger letdown of the year so far, lol

 

[Ellocohombre]

Hey I read the review and that is not was indicated. Wanted everything covered,tried back door,turned down.
Some grammar mistakes possible. There is one dude on here that writes his whole review in one big sentence, very little punctuation. Try understanding that babble brain.

 

[taurean2003]

Recently, I've seen Tina 2xs, and all activities were done covered, except BBBJ at beginning. I highly doubt this seasoned lady is doing BB anal?

 

[Steelhead]

Recently, I've seen Tina 2xs, and all activities were done covered, except BBBJ at beginning. I highly doubt this seasoned lady is doing BB anal?

Not to belabor this but no one mentioned anything about BB Anal.
For me personally, It's simply two issues or questions:

Is she providing anal which is absolutely her prerogative?

The bigger question:

If she is, did the reviewer, go from Anal to Mish using the same condom?

I believe and unfortunately, it won't matter how this plays out anyway, with the slightest mention in the review, the genie's out of the bottle,... she's damned if she didn't, damned if she did. As the hobby goes, she'll pick up new clients, the masses thinking the possibility might exist,....and those whom won't give her the benefit of doubt.