-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Review: Chanel - GGS - Big Tit Paradise!
- Thread starter Evolfonam
- Start date
@Evolfonam, agree with hhs pos review of your review. But for fun, and because Im anal, Id like to discuss your quantitative scores. Face and service are subjective, I'd probably drop the face to 6.75 or 7.0, but 7.25 is well within the bound of reason. She has an attractive face that some men might even go to 8. Thats not totally nuts. Service can be an 8 on a non-GFE scale. (What she does to you is kinda meh, but how she responds to what you do to her is crazy hot, though likely that's heavily influenced by the fact that SHE is crazy hot.
As the self appointed boob arbiter here, I'd go over 9...I'd have let that go, but you are not averse to decimals. An 8 ass? It's funny to me that on this board you can find an ass-rating of Michelle/now Brandy AT THIS SAME PLACE, of the very same 8.0 you've assigned Chanel. You sir, are insulting her ass! I am the white knight of Chanel's ass who must defend its honor.
Until the established in-house assmasters weigh in, ass also has to be at least 9.0.
Now, lets talk about that bust-waist-ass combo score. 8.5. Reasonable men, including me, can argue there are better breasts out there. Very few, and by a razor thin margin. And a few who perhaps have better asses. But together? And with that waist? No freakin way.
Indulge me one last sports metaphor. In the 1976 Montreal Olympics there was great buzz about a young gymnast from Romania. At the time, gymnasts were also scored on a 0-10 scale. But a 10 had always been reserved for theoretical perfection that was impossible to achieve by mere mortals. Even the GOAT to date at that time, Olga Korbut, had never been granted a 10. But as this young Romanian dismounted from the uneven bars, neither the judges from the Eastern block, nor the judges from the Western democracies could deny what they had just seen and experienced.
10. 10. 10. 10s across the board.
If you would like to hold out the theoretical possibility that something even better is out there in the silhouette department, a 9.9 is an acceptable answer. But I am here today, to say unto all of you, that Chanel is the Nadia Comaneci of tits-waist-and ass.
Chanel gets a 10.
As the self appointed boob arbiter here, I'd go over 9...I'd have let that go, but you are not averse to decimals. An 8 ass? It's funny to me that on this board you can find an ass-rating of Michelle/now Brandy AT THIS SAME PLACE, of the very same 8.0 you've assigned Chanel. You sir, are insulting her ass! I am the white knight of Chanel's ass who must defend its honor.
Until the established in-house assmasters weigh in, ass also has to be at least 9.0.
Now, lets talk about that bust-waist-ass combo score. 8.5. Reasonable men, including me, can argue there are better breasts out there. Very few, and by a razor thin margin. And a few who perhaps have better asses. But together? And with that waist? No freakin way.
Indulge me one last sports metaphor. In the 1976 Montreal Olympics there was great buzz about a young gymnast from Romania. At the time, gymnasts were also scored on a 0-10 scale. But a 10 had always been reserved for theoretical perfection that was impossible to achieve by mere mortals. Even the GOAT to date at that time, Olga Korbut, had never been granted a 10. But as this young Romanian dismounted from the uneven bars, neither the judges from the Eastern block, nor the judges from the Western democracies could deny what they had just seen and experienced.
10. 10. 10. 10s across the board.
If you would like to hold out the theoretical possibility that something even better is out there in the silhouette department, a 9.9 is an acceptable answer. But I am here today, to say unto all of you, that Chanel is the Nadia Comaneci of tits-waist-and ass.
Chanel gets a 10.
Haha, BK... had a feeling this was coming! And I welcome your always interesting and well thought out viewpoint.
A far as her face... that's a hard one. With careful study, she doesn't have the typical features that would lead me to score as high as I did, but I was heavily influenced by her facial expressions, the glimmer of her eyes, and of course her over all sexiness.
The 9 for boobs... took a point off due to being MM. Call it discrimination perhaps, lol, but that was my reasoning. They are freakin spectacular!
Ok, as for her ass... I stand by my score of 8 (though might consider bumping it up to 8.5). A very high score (8) still, and it is quite incredible. But I can't help to compare to some of the more meaty Latinas (and others) I've had. Same goes with the b/w/h ratio.
Love the Nadia C metaphor! I totally get why you'd score an absolute 10 for Chanel, but with all due respect I'd put her more in the almost equally incredible Olga K category... Still WORLD-CLASS! Chanel gets gold from me!
A far as her face... that's a hard one. With careful study, she doesn't have the typical features that would lead me to score as high as I did, but I was heavily influenced by her facial expressions, the glimmer of her eyes, and of course her over all sexiness.
The 9 for boobs... took a point off due to being MM. Call it discrimination perhaps, lol, but that was my reasoning. They are freakin spectacular!
Ok, as for her ass... I stand by my score of 8 (though might consider bumping it up to 8.5). A very high score (8) still, and it is quite incredible. But I can't help to compare to some of the more meaty Latinas (and others) I've had. Same goes with the b/w/h ratio.
Love the Nadia C metaphor! I totally get why you'd score an absolute 10 for Chanel, but with all due respect I'd put her more in the almost equally incredible Olga K category... Still WORLD-CLASS! Chanel gets gold from me!
Blah blah blah. Why you gotta ruin my poetry?
I think at some point on this board I compared some girl to Lance Armstrong. Oh, it was P31 Love! In theory, of course, natural is better. Which is why I want you to certify Chanel's ass already. In practice.......SEEMS natural (enough) is best. But let's go a layer deeper. Is it really that different from the suspension of disbelief we inherently engage in here? The best girls are those that SEEM to really be excited to do dirty dirty things with us.
Someday there will be realistic hooker robots, and our great-grandsons are going to take this debate to a whole new level. And I will be firmly in the "old school". Well, no, I'll be dead. But if I were alive, I'd be in the old school. Kids today, with their goddamn hooker robots. No respect for God's work.
I think at some point on this board I compared some girl to Lance Armstrong. Oh, it was P31 Love! In theory, of course, natural is better. Which is why I want you to certify Chanel's ass already. In practice.......SEEMS natural (enough) is best. But let's go a layer deeper. Is it really that different from the suspension of disbelief we inherently engage in here? The best girls are those that SEEM to really be excited to do dirty dirty things with us.
Someday there will be realistic hooker robots, and our great-grandsons are going to take this debate to a whole new level. And I will be firmly in the "old school". Well, no, I'll be dead. But if I were alive, I'd be in the old school. Kids today, with their goddamn hooker robots. No respect for God's work.
Fwiw, I just recalled something... Chanel remembered my name and used it throughout the hour, which kind of surprised me. I've noticed most providers rarely say my name (unless having seem them numerous times, and even then pretty uncommon), and usually refer to me as "baby", "handsome", and the like... as I imagine these ladies usually forget our names within 2 mins of meeting us! This may seem rather trivial to most, but I found this personal touch (moaning my name as she rode me CG!) quite enjoyable.
Agree! This is shockingly rare! (And tbh, I don't think Chanel did with me.....but she has to pretend she remembers me, so I guess it's awkward to say "what's your name again?")
You know who I remember doing that, and then weaving my name into the session? Plastic Ivy at Red Sun. That's one of the reasons I gave her huge thumbs up for "authentic personality" and seeming to be actually interested in learning a little bit about me. Ivy is an extraordinarily well-programmed robot hooker. Giant kudos to those software developers.
PS - I think the Asians tend to prefer "honey" to "baby".
You know who I remember doing that, and then weaving my name into the session? Plastic Ivy at Red Sun. That's one of the reasons I gave her huge thumbs up for "authentic personality" and seeming to be actually interested in learning a little bit about me. Ivy is an extraordinarily well-programmed robot hooker. Giant kudos to those software developers.
PS - I think the Asians tend to prefer "honey" to "baby".
surname
Lol, I thought perhaps it was just me, but I find it really ads to the intimacy, and having the bangin Chanel utter my name while doing her was quite the turn-on! I don't believe I got that with Ivy.
From here on out, with every girl, I'm gonna be like Ali vs Terrell (1967 heavyweight championship) saying "What's my name?!" in the middle of our love-bout!
That's the original definition? Haven't heard that before. Perhaps you're correct but I'd say that even with "sweet, friendly and affectionate", without DFK I wouldn't consider it true GFE. I might even forgive cbj, and I'm not even sure about that, but must stand my ground on... no dfk = non-gfe.
Lol, I thought perhaps it was just me, but I find it really ads to the intimacy, and having the bangin Chanel utter my name while doing her was quite the turn-on! I don't believe I got that with Ivy.
From here on out, with every girl, I'm gonna be like Ali vs Terrell (1967 heavyweight championship) saying "What's my name?!" in the middle of our love-bout!
That's the original definition? Haven't heard that before. Perhaps you're correct but I'd say that even with "sweet, friendly and affectionate", without DFK I wouldn't consider it true GFE. I might even forgive cbj, and I'm not even sure about that, but must stand my ground on... no dfk = non-gfe.