Y'all thought I was long-winded before. Oh, brother, buckle up.
I'm going to take these as sincere questions rather than rhetorical or an opportunity to show off. In these case, while I strongly disagree, I will try to stay respectful. Forgive me if it comes over as otherwise. (Yeah, maybe I was not so much in the case of that other recent dissent).
And right, many of you are too busy, so I'll do an exec summary version and then follow with an extended re-mix / grad school seminar for those that are intertested.
why you think I or other like minded veteran hobbyists should spend the next $600 on Aurora and not go split one or two young Japanese girls apart (whom have somewhat less body count).
There's like 30 Japanese girls I can pick this weekend in NYC, but why Aurora?
The simple answer is,
1A. YOU should not. Of course. Pretty clear you and I are looking for different things. We are probably not all that like-minded in the end.
1B. Precisely BECAUSE there are THIRTY other Japanese girls. There is one Aurora. OK, technically there now are 2 Auroras, the other apparently being a 19-year old screaming J Girl in whom I have zero interest. But you get what I mean. We still have basic ECON101 theory to contend with.
1C. Re: "body count", maybe over a lifetime, but manifestly NOT over the course of the day/week you're seeing these children. That's actually a key difference in the other direction. Not to mention the body count that is going in raw.
1D. Re-read the review. Last year's too. Thought it's pretty freakin clear why I think Aurora is the GOAT with many many details. Not sure what else I have to point out, but try this on for size for starters. Replace "Aurora" with your favorite 21-or-under JGirl's name. Would ANY sentence I wrote make any sense with that girl's name instead? I think not.
1E. For what it's worth, did y'all not notice that the author of the initial dissent noted he preferred two women that are, to my eye and ability to do math, significantly older than Aurora? (Still great girls! If we can call them girls).
I saw her for 280 at Goodgirls in 2021. Yes, she looks great and is very good at her job. But if she is not doing anything extra that she didn't do 2 and a half years ago, why would you pay more than double today? Pay maybe 50 to 100 more for the nicer place and inflation. But a line must be drawn. Can't say that I blame her though . If guys are willing to pay that then she is just being a good businesswoman.
This is a common line of reasoning. It's a very human, but from an economic perspective an essentially irrational framework for viewing the problem.
2A. I can do you better. I had her for 240 in 2018. She was prima facie extraordinarily and historically undervalued all that time through 2021. We all got away with murder. (BTW, I see this line of reasoning frequently cited with Gisella and her tenure as Sugar. She too was also ridiculously undervalued at the time compared to her peers. When I met G as S, I told a few PM dudes - this one is better than the 450/500 girls at VIPSpot. Then she became a 500 girl at VIPSpot).
2B. If I could choose between Aurora at 280 vs Aurora at 600, which would I choose? Let me think about that. OK, I thought about it. I would choose Aurora at 280. That is not the choice we have before us. (Actually, you COULD make an argument that Aurora at 600 IS better in some ways, because you're getting a fresher Aurora who seems to have landed on her optimal balance of revenue vs strain on her body. This may sound weird, but she seems happy with this phase of her career. Or at least comfortable. She gets to do things the way she wants to do things. That was not always the case at GGS. There is significant value in that.)
2C. I have a line too. And I crossed it. More in the grad school seminar why I don't regret it. And why I might do it again. Which means, yeah, I'm kinda fucked.
2D I actually DID write about how things are different now. I certainly did so in last year's opus. Sure, in a sense those things are intangible - though some of the tangible things are done even better now - but those intangible things are very very important to me, if not, it seems, to most of you. Some of that may be due to building a "relationship" - or we can probably call it rapport without resorting to quotes. It's not a real relationship, but it is a real rapport. This is impossible with the revolving door we so often see now, unless you're seeing your favorite JGirl 3x a week for multiple hours during her 4-week tour. I'm getting a simulated mistress, not a hole with a pretty wrapper.
In the longer version, I'm going to ask you all to do a little self-reflection on what we're looking for when we do this, and what it is we think we're paying for. We'll do a deep dive into the value of momentary pleasure vs the value of the MEMORY of momentary pleasure, sliding scale notions of "value" as well as "marginal value", how to view your choices not in isolation but as a package of choices. And then we'll dabble in an extended analogy to residential real estate. No sports analogies! I will also lay out - AGAIN - because apparently many of you didn't catch it the first 17 times - the many specific areas, where, in my view, nobody can remotely touch her. I will explain specifically why in pure 1-on-1 match-up, I would vastly prefer Aurora to my conquest today, who is probably the hottest 20-something JGirl around at the moment - while still respecting both today's conquest and those of you who would vastly prefer her. (Because that girl IS super pretty.......highly recommended, if you can squeeze your ass and genitalia into her crowded schedule).