Oooh ooh ooh. I can handle this one. I've seen all 4 girls in question, so you should have asked that question on MY review. Heh.
I think those MG girls are all quite lovely, as you can see when I reviewed them (interestingly, before any of them were at MG). But, in a word, NO.
First of all Chanel is much younger than M or D. Maybe Iris is around the same age, though a PM buddy thinks Iris is much older than I perceived her to be.
Iris is the most interesting comp. There's a bit of a similarity there. I felt like Iris could be Aurora's not bad at all in isolation but not nearly as attractive sister. I actually wrote about how I felt her face was like a mix of Chanel's and one particular not thought-of-as-attractive celebrity. Iris DOES have an AMAZING ass. So I wouldn't mock you as an idiot if you said you liked hers better than Chanel's, though I would still disagree. I agree she is an excellent kisser and very good in the sack. But the rack is fairly pedestrian (fine, but not outstanding Cs) and just is not in the same conversation. There's also, I found a bit of professional distance. Now Chanel had a bit of that too when I first met her, but even then it was more of an elegant hostess' professional distance, whereas Iris has a bit of let's get to business thing going on, so it's different. And in C's case, that distance is all gone now, though some of that could be a matter of repeating. Iris is not exactly a poor man's version of Chanel, but maybe a middle class man's version of Chanel. Or, more literally she's a 320-350 version of Chanel.
Michelle has a fine but slightly overrated rack. Ass is more than fine, though I would say not quite in the Iris and Chanel level. Service is very good...she's loads of fun! Girl has got serious stamina. (As do Iris and Dana now that you mention it). And she has been nothing but very nice to me. Even when I wanted her to he mean and bitchy to me! (See the failed psychodrama review). But again, she lacks the artistry and emotion that C brings. And while I find her attractive, I can't think of a single visual element where she is at C/A's level.
Dana is very pretty. I wouldn't spend much energy contesting you if you wanted to say her basic features are the prettiest in this group of 4, though again I would pick C/A. But again, a bit older, and her teeth are a touch discolored. She has great boobs, though still a full notch at least below the quality of C's. And she doesn't have the curves elsewhere that the other 3 have. On our repeat, the chemistry was quite good. So I have her overall rated higher than Michelle or Iris.
Michelle and Iris have stronger English, so fewer opportunities for misunderstanding. Dana has the lowest English proficiency. Iris comes over as more interesting to talk to. I might say if I just wanted to grab a beer and chat, fully dressed, not touching, I might pick Iris even over C/A. Though of course I would go bonkers insane to be within 10 feet of C/A and not be able to touch her. C/A is in the middle in proficiency, but is capable of saying what needs to be said, and lately I'm finding she has a better sense of humor and a more layered personality than I had realized.
So in sum, those 3 girls are all quite nice, each with her own strongpoints and flaws, like all of us. But not perfection. Whereas C/A is as close as you can get to perfection. She is not like all of us.
Chanel/Aurora's body is just another stratosphere. And her demeanor, the way she moves, which Evol calls kitten-like, and I call elegant with an artistic flair, is unique. (She has some dance background). Guys don't talk enough about her astonishing flexibility and agility which leads to insane visuals. Her responsiveness, especially lately is off the charts. And it comes with a certain component of emotion that only she does, at least in my experience. Oh, and if you DO get the DFK......it's the best. Too bad for anyone who isn't gifted that! So, I guess it's true that DFK with any of those 3 girls is better than no DFK with A/C! Heh.
As always, I can't tell you how much marginal $ value you should put on that additional marginal quality given a certain budget. But it's unquestionable that the marginal quality is significant.
