AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: 3D Mimi

anarchy08016

Review Contributor
Messages: 127
Reviews: 20
Joined
#2
You fucked Mimi bareback? Please elaborate. Was it in the shower when she makes you think you are BB or was it in the room when you can actually see whats going on?

I ask because you may have fucked half of this forum........
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#4
BB should be an exception considering the risks involved. This goes beyond which services are offered and directly to public health. Certainly this hobby comes with risks but many assume that providers are using protection when seeing clients. This piece of information will allow everyone to determine for themselves whether they want to assume the risks involved with a Provider who rides bb.
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#7
Keeping something this important private goes beyond keeping activities confidential. It’s a serious health risk that should be communicated for the good of all and not limited only to those who have access to private details. I think we should allow some discretion when it comes to public health and make the distinction between this sort of information and a more general review of an encounter with a provider.
 

Wayne1250

Review Contributor
Messages: 11,267
Reviews: 98
Joined
#8
The OP put it in his review, why repeat it. Everyone is big enough to read it and decide for themselves. Yes it is a health risk but does it need to elaborated on in the review section?

This topic has been beat to death over and over. Maybe another general discussion thread us in order because this occurs at many places.

And yes, I respect your opinion and usually agree with you, just not 100% on this one.
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#9
I agree this issue has been beaten to death but everyone talks past one another. My point is that limiting this type of information prevents people without access to private details to vital information not related to the performance per se of the particular provider. Just imagine if a person schedules an appointment with a risky provider without access to private details but based on a generalized perception from public details and gets infected and subsequently infects someone else. Imagine how that monger would feel knowing that if the information was shared he would have avoided the provider. Now he’s affected two lives and may have harmed many more relationships. Wouldn’t members of this board feel at least a little remorse knowing they held back information that potentially had devastating consequences only because it was considered private information for a select few that had access to it? My conscience would be troubled to say the least.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 369
Reviews: 54
Joined
#10
I agree this issue has been beaten to death but everyone talks past one another. My point is that limiting this type of information prevents people without access to private details to vital information not related to the performance per se of the particular provider. Just imagine if a person schedules an appointment with a risky provider without access to private details but based on a generalized perception from public details and gets infected and subsequently infects someone else. Imagine how that monger would feel knowing that if the information was shared he would have avoided the provider. Now he’s affected two lives and may have harmed many more relationships. Wouldn’t members of this board feel at least a little remorse knowing they held back information that potentially had devastating consequences only because it was considered private information for a select few that had access to it? My conscience would be troubled to say the least.
It’s very easy to resolve. Post a review then you can have access. We are all adults here and know the risks this hobby entails. No reason to blast it out in the open public forum. It’s against the rules and violators should be banned for violating the very clear rules. Or here’s an idea if you are that alarmed, just don’t hobby anymore if you are that concerned about it.
 

Waterboy

Hero of the stupid
Messages: 3,575
Reviews: 40
Joined
#11
I agree this issue has been beaten to death but everyone talks past one another. My point is that limiting this type of information prevents people without access to private details to vital information not related to the performance per se of the particular provider. Just imagine if a person schedules an appointment with a risky provider without access to private details but based on a generalized perception from public details and gets infected and subsequently infects someone else. Imagine how that monger would feel knowing that if the information was shared he would have avoided the provider. Now he’s affected two lives and may have harmed many more relationships. Wouldn’t members of this board feel at least a little remorse knowing they held back information that potentially had devastating consequences only because it was considered private information for a select few that had access to it? My conscience would be troubled to say the least.
I would not. When in a session do only what you feel comfortable with.
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#12
It’s very easy to resolve. Post a review then you can have access. We are all adults here and know the risks this hobby entails. No reason to blast it out in the open public forum. It’s against the rules and violators should be banned for violating the very clear rules. Or here’s an idea if you are that alarmed, just don’t hobby anymore if you are that concerned about it.
Again, you (and others) miss my point.
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#13
What if getting infected was due to a session with the intention of writing a review afterward and gain access to the reviews. In this scenario it’s too little too late.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 369
Reviews: 54
Joined
#14
What if getting infected was due to a session with the intention of writing a review afterward and gain access to the reviews. In this scenario it’s too little too late.
Your stream of “what if’s” does not outweigh the need for privacy. And if you are taking precautions the risk is reduced. Furthermore, you are being naive if you think this doesn’t happen more often than reported. Relying upon the reviews of others to determine whether or not you should partake with a provider is not foolproof. Again we are all adults and need to take personal responsibility for our actions. Otherwise sit at home and watch youporn massage vids for your release.
 

Buttlover

Review Contributor
Messages: 369
Reviews: 54
Joined
#15
What if getting infected was due to a session with the intention of writing a review afterward and gain access to the reviews. In this scenario it’s too little too late.
You could always pay for a VIP membership too and have access. So if it was that important to know then again take personal responsibility and pony up the funds for private access. That’s what a responsible person would do. So I do get your point. Your point is that it’s everyone else’s fault because someone decides to engage in an activity that it by it’s very nature risky. I would feel zero responsibility for what someone else does or doesn’t do. I really wish the mods would step in and delete this whole stream of ridiculous debate over imaginary scenarios.
 

mikey_machine

Registered Member
Messages: 106
Reviews: 9
Joined
#16
You could always pay for a VIP membership too and have access. So if it was that important to know then again take personal responsibility and pony up the funds for private access. That’s what a responsible person would do. So I do get your point. Your point is that it’s everyone else’s fault because someone decides to engage in an activity that it by it’s very nature risky. I would feel zero responsibility for what someone else does or doesn’t do. I really wish the mods would step in and delete this whole stream of ridiculous debate over imaginary scenarios.
Its allot of "what ifs, might have been, and maybes...."..I feel like this is a casino forum..and surely risk there lol
 

Wormwood1988

Registered Member
Messages: 298
Reviews: 4
Joined
#17
“So I do get your point. Your point is that it’s everyone else’s fault because someone decides to engage in an activity that it by it’s very nature risky”. — you don’t get my point because this isn’t my point.
 

Onehotsexyman

Review Contributor
Messages: 910
Reviews: 57
Joined
#18
I sit here and read all this very private information. I hate to lose our favorite place . We know a lot of different people read this information and by continuing will put a lot in jeopardy. This is my opinion. No need to reply . Let's post positive experience when they are deserved. Thank you very much.
 
Top