AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: 309 Evergreen

Status
Not open for further replies.

fffinster

Casual Monger
Messages: 1,113
Reviews: 95
Joined
#2
It is interesting that 309 is the only place that has been reviewed by this contributor. With another full service joint practically across the street and a few others within 15 miles, you think he'd play the field more.
 

Eagles34

Registered Member
Messages: 393
Reviews: 31
Joined
#8
@fffinster It does matter! Look at the 5 parlor raid in KS recently.
I'm with fffinster-
Do you really think LE needs to come here to do their job? The only thing this page will do is give the woman/wife looking for a legit massage info about a location if she decides to dig into it. That is the fault of the person that designed this website to have phone numbers linked directly to Google. Look at half of the avatars with naked Asian women and most of the responses by everyone (I could go through 80% of the threads and know whats going on). Just the public view format alone-"Physical description" and "private details"...even if they aren't filled out why would anyone need that if they were getting a therapeutic massage? Anyway- what are we saying about the original review? Because the date is off that it's fake?
 

Chiparlor

Has Decided to Walk on Earth.
Messages: 2,604
Reviews: 38
Joined
#11
@fffinster "PM'ing keeps the knowledge from being shared with real members." Real members are anyone who signed up for this site. I think we need to show respect for providers and posting a question asking for FruitStand in open forum is not necessary.

Yes, the secrets were out, and we can minimize it by saying less in open forum and share via PM.

@Eagles34 The Admin who implemented this site is not at fault because he provided this site as a privilege. It is up to us to join or not and it is up to us how we say it.

Will leave the rest of this thread alone as long as I stated the opinions and/or facts and move on to better things.
 

Ellocohombre

Review Contributor
Messages: 7,194
Reviews: 51
Joined
#13
Dude you have access to Private Details. All you have to do is read the review and it says the service provided . So there is no need to ask a follow up question that the whole world can read. I think you knew the answer to your own question before you even asked it. You just wanted to be blatant.
 

Ellocohombre

Review Contributor
Messages: 7,194
Reviews: 51
Joined
#14
What the heck do think this site is for? A FS review/question is what? Something bold? new? Out of the ordinary? Have read the reviews on this site-no one is asking for her phone home number, give me a break Saint Ello . . .the site is FULL of FS reviews-it is its bread & butter-I think the secret is out-
My comment above is in response to this post.
 

Bdog72

Registered Member
Messages: 30
Reviews: 5
Joined
#16
Nothing suspect, really? Her last day before leaving on vacation was the 21st, 5 days prior to the date the OP claimed he visited. And Physical description, "Looked good to me", that's really helpful to first timers. And please, the Private Details almost appear to be snippets cut and pasted from prior reviews of this spa and provider.
Yes. Nothing suspect other than the date. My opinion. The board police have to hit almost every thread from the looks of it.
 

Bdog72

Registered Member
Messages: 30
Reviews: 5
Joined
#18
Thanks for the all caps to make your point or I may have missed it. I know she was not there.
My point is that there was nothing wrong with the SUBSTANCE OF THE REVIEW (caps added).
People make mistakes with dates or put the date of the review in instead of the date of the meeting. But then the self-appointed board police pounce and go nuts. I get it.
 

oldhorndog53

Review Contributor
Messages: 2,749
Reviews: 23
Joined
#19
Thanks for the all caps to make your point or I may have missed it. I know she was not there.
My point is that there was nothing wrong with the SUBSTANCE OF THE REVIEW (caps added).
People make mistakes with dates or put the date of the review in instead of the date of the meeting. But then the self-appointed board police pounce and go nuts. I get it.
Can we all agree then, that before posting a bogus review, the diligent monger should call the spa and make sure the provider is working on that date? Lol. @Voodoo66, would you please put this thread to rest? Thank you.
 

retired051923

Don't PM me.
Messages: 1,161
Reviews: 10
Joined
#20
Actually, it is quite common to not list the actual date publicly. There are a number of reliable posters that use this method for their own reasons (ex. girls that read the site, personal preference, etc). In my opinion, as long as it is in the 30 day window, then all good. I would say the bigger problem would be publicly posting a girls private schedule just to call someone out as FAKE. Thread is closed and will be scrubbed. Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top