Observation

[Mamluke13]

seems when backpage shut down. They started street walking, but they cost more than fast houses. Black women were escorting alot on the Internet until latins took over. And the latins offered more affordable prices. Asian escorts are alot it seems latin and asian phased out the black ones.
White escorts cost thr most and are more discrimantory towards black men. I remember being at a swingers clubs and this white women's boxed smelled like sewage. The nerve of them feeling so cocky about there self. I noticed arabs and Indian, rarely if ever escort. I wonder how much money girls on backpage was making.

You have listcrawler and sumo search but i heard it ain't as good as backpage. I heard they had a great place called club j. The models were on streethoodworod.com. They had some great talent I heard. But how it seems pretty dead the whole scene,the swinger scene also.

 

[Nikki Sixx]

Backpage was best, simply because they got to the front before anyone else. But they left everyone else a bad hand. Backpage is directly responsible for Fosta Sesta.

Black women still get on listcrawler in large numbers. Latins have increased, but their service is generally lame, in my view.

 

[Johnnylovesmassages]

Backpage was best, simply because they got to the front before anyone else. But they left everyone else a bad hand. Backpage is directly responsible for Fosta Sesta.

Black women still get on listcrawler in large numbers. Latins have increased, but their service is generally lame, in my view.

are you saying that Fosta Sesta is a bad thing?

 

[SincerelyWF]

are you saying that Fosta Sesta is a bad thing?

Fosta-sesta is absolutely a bad thing.

 

[richardp2918]

Fosta-sesta is absolutely a bad thing.

I'm surprised it's survived legal challenge as long as it has. Clear violation of first amendment

 

[Johnnylovesmassages]

Fosta-sesta is absolutely a bad thing.

wait, so you think that knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking is a GOOD thing and should be allowed? Are you nuts??? I am not saying this should be used against sex workers, but if someone is being sex trafficked, you think that's ok?

 

[SincerelyWF]

wait, so you think that knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking is a GOOD thing and should be allowed? Are you nuts??? I am not saying this should be used against sex workers, but if someone is being sex trafficked, you think that's ok?

Absolutely NOT! Sex trafficking is absolutely abhorrent and shouldn’t be encouraged at ALL.

But we aren’t talking about sex trafficking. We’re talking about Fosta-sesta which is a piece of legislation that increases the chances of trafficking while criminalizing consensual sex work and making it less safe.

So by supportiting it, you, Johnny, are actively increasing the amount of sec trafficking in the world and making sex work more dangerous for workers. Which means more screening and other shittiness for us mongers.

 

[richardp2918]

Absolutely NOT! Sex trafficking is absolutely abhorrent and shouldn’t be encouraged at ALL.

But we aren’t talking about sex trafficking. We’re talking about Fosta-sesta which is a piece of legislation that increases the chances of trafficking while criminalizing consensual sex work and making it less safe.

So by supportiting it, you, Johnny, are actively increasing the amount of sec trafficking in the world and making sex work more dangerous for workers. Which means more screening and other shittiness for us mongers.

I'm no lawyer, but my understanding of it is that the practical end result of it is that it's driven sex work and it's advertising underground, onto the streets, more exposed to criminal elements, with less ability for women to screen their clients. Many articles if you care to google for them, but a few examples:

https://newrepublic.com/article/162823/sex-trafficking-sex-work-sesta-fosta
https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/4/13/17172762/fosta-sesta-backpage-230-internet-freedom

Conceptually, supporting free speech does not mean supporting every crazy thing said under free speech. If you believe in freedom to engage in sex work, then there's nothing wrong with advertising it. If there's sex trafficking, clamp down on the criminals, not all the many sex workers and advertisers voluntarily and freely participating in it.

 

[Nikki Sixx]

are you saying that Fosta Sesta is a bad thing?

Yeah.. duh?

It attempts to destroy free speech, and assume criminality upfront with no evidence or due process.

 

[Nikki Sixx]

wait, so you think that knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking is a GOOD thing and should be allowed? Are you nuts??? I am not saying this should be used against sex workers, but if someone is being sex trafficked, you think that's ok?

That is a red herring statement that is outside the scope of the argument for or against Fosta-Sesta. Nobody here supports trafficking. You know that, but choose obtuseness over credulity.

 

[Johnnylovesmassages]

That is a red herring statement that is outside the scope of the argument for or against Fosta-Sesta. Nobody here supports trafficking. You know that, but choose obtuseness over credulity.

ok thanks for sharing

 

[Doubleyellow]

wait, so you think that knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking is a GOOD thing and should be allowed? Are you nuts??? I am not saying this should be used against sex workers, but if someone is being sex trafficked, you think that's ok?

you got a little ahead of yourself.