While the bailout for the banks were for companies that were mainly located in wall street. Their bailouts are not passed along to the state. This current bailout for the airline industry such as boeing, delta and america are located in chicago and atlanta. Neither of those cities or states will see money from these bailout loans either. Unless youre referring to their potential jobs saved. Then I will concede that a portion of those employees related to those states will be saved, but it will be marginal. Thus, referring to a bailout of any company isn't really relevant to this topic on federal redistribution of state resources.
Drug companies do overcharge for their products and thats a federal issue failing to regulate them properly. There was no bailout for this industry, but there are a number of employees in the state. But, if you want to talk about employees, then Boston has the most and SF is the second most. NJ is third. But, then you're talking about industries in general and that again does not support this argument.
I will discuss farm laws because they do not support the country. Our laws support the over production corn forcing the use of high fructose corn syrup and other products. The farms are not small farmers but big aggro. This is not about helping the country. This is just an industry making money like pharma or wall street the same.
If we're talking about unemployement benefits from this bill, that is yet to be released and there are 28 states that are insolvent and the bill did not state that it is going to aid any one state more than another. Thus, this is an assumption. The same can be said about the NYS corporation comment. The only industry we know for sure is airline and hotel. Neither are industries based in NY.
I can't say others, but I can tell you that I do look into these factors and while you make valid points there are definitely assumptions being made that are inappropriate.
Drug companies do overcharge for their products and thats a federal issue failing to regulate them properly. There was no bailout for this industry, but there are a number of employees in the state. But, if you want to talk about employees, then Boston has the most and SF is the second most. NJ is third. But, then you're talking about industries in general and that again does not support this argument.
I will discuss farm laws because they do not support the country. Our laws support the over production corn forcing the use of high fructose corn syrup and other products. The farms are not small farmers but big aggro. This is not about helping the country. This is just an industry making money like pharma or wall street the same.
If we're talking about unemployement benefits from this bill, that is yet to be released and there are 28 states that are insolvent and the bill did not state that it is going to aid any one state more than another. Thus, this is an assumption. The same can be said about the NYS corporation comment. The only industry we know for sure is airline and hotel. Neither are industries based in NY.
I can't say others, but I can tell you that I do look into these factors and while you make valid points there are definitely assumptions being made that are inappropriate.
