AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Latina sex worker killed in Soho Hotel

MongersGonnaMong

Review Contributor
Messages: 942
Reviews: 39
Joined
#5
So you’re saying it wouldn’t prevent her death it would just be easier to arrest him, that’s not sufficient
obviously this won’t be 100% foolproof but it does make it safer for the girls to vet someone through ID rather than nothing at all



I get some mongers are sensitive about providing ID and of course you’re not submitting it to some street walker on Roosevelt Ave but the established sex workers do require it
 

ruizzimo

Registered Member
Messages: 126
Reviews: 3
Joined
#6
yes, killers have IDs.
But people dealing in good faith are more likely to go through with screening requirements and in that way it does reduce danger. We don't know if she was a sw and if she screened but its very sad news either way. rip
 

Balmain

Registered Member
Messages: 74
Reviews: 5
Joined
#7
So you’re saying it wouldn’t prevent her death it would just be easier to arrest him, that’s not sufficient
Please put a little more effort into thinking logically about issues.

Screening w/ ID can reduce the probability of something like this happening because would-be predators are deterred if they know there’s a paper trail that could easily lead back to them.

Of course, there are some highly impulsive and psychopathic people out there who could potentially screen with ID and still commit murder, but the likelihood of this happening is less with ID screening than without ID screening.

Not sure if in this specific case ID screening was/ was not done.
 

ruizzimo

Registered Member
Messages: 126
Reviews: 3
Joined
#9
Please put a little more effort into thinking logically about issues.

Screening w/ ID can reduce the probability of something like this happening because would-be predators are deterred if they know there’s a paper trail that could easily lead back to them.

Of course, there are some highly impulsive and psychopathic people out there who could potentially screen with ID and still commit murder, but the likelihood of this happening is less with ID screening than without ID screening.

Not sure if in this specific case ID screening was/ was not done.

I'd say this goes for any kind of screening - ID, references, etc. The practice exist for a very good reason. I've always screened and never had any issues.
 

Barterings

Registered Member
Messages: 54
Joined
#13
Please put a little more effort into thinking logically about issues.

Screening w/ ID can reduce the probability of something like this happening because would-be predators are deterred if they know there’s a paper trail that could easily lead back to them.

Of course, there are some highly impulsive and psychopathic people out there who could potentially screen with ID and still commit murder, but the likelihood of this happening is less with ID screening than without ID screening.

Not sure if in this specific case ID screening was/ was not done.
In just one thread before this , I read that anonymity is the most important thing about this hobby, so which one is it?
The paper trail leading back to them is exactly what the average normal non murderous person wants to avoid
 

solomon_456

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,827
Reviews: 14
Joined
#14
In just one thread before this , I read that anonymity is the most important thing about this hobby, so which one is it?
The paper trail leading back to them is exactly what the average normal non murderous person wants to avoid
Ppl who’re basically lonely no SO and no job to lose will come and tell you you should provide ID otherwise you’re a borderline criminal, I would pay double for same service as not to have to provide ID
 

krideynyc

Registered Member
Messages: 3,284
Reviews: 9
Joined
#15
In just one thread before this , I read that anonymity is the most important thing about this hobby, so which one is it?
Both. Up to both of you to decide how much exposure is acceptable for this hobby. Until someone winds up dead and the Police is involved. Anonymity no longer applies.

The paper trail leading back to them is exactly what the average normal non murderous person wants to avoid
And it will stay that way. Provided no one gets killed or arrested.
 

Balmain

Registered Member
Messages: 74
Reviews: 5
Joined
#16
In just one thread before this , I read that anonymity is the most important thing about this hobby, so which one is it?
The paper trail leading back to them is exactly what the average normal non murderous person wants to avoid
I’ve personally never provided an ID during screening, and never would, especially when providers don’t offer the same level of personal disclosure at the screening stage.

But the question was about how ID screening could factor into the likelihood of a provider being murdered in the line of duty.

I also think that more generally, any sense of safety associated with screening is really an illusion - as circumventing the requirements of screening is doable by anyone who has the cleverness and motivation.

However, even when confronted with artificial barriers, I believe most humans are too lazy or unimaginative to effectively work the system that they find themselves an agent in.
 

User826

Review Contributor
Messages: 702
Reviews: 12
Joined
#19
Because an ID would have prevented this. Logic goes out of the window when your dick is involved. Fingers crossed you don't have someone spiteful enough to blackmail you.

This is an occupational hazard. Always has been, always will be. Johns get beaten up, robbed or killed as do providers. Everyone involved is taking a risk.
 
Top