She is the only one who knows who much her target income is, and whether she is getting the interest from well-to-do clients to reach it. If she is, good for her. If she is not, she will adjust--one way or another.
I don't know anything else about her, and at that price point I am sure I never will, but she has the looks that might be able to pull it off. It least some guys will take a deeper look. In NYC, DC (and I assume LA) there is a tier of women at--and well above--that price level. I do know a few socially, not professionally, who charge a minimum of $5K--granted that is for more than an hour, but it is still a minimum. They also know that they will not get a lot of takers, but honestly they don't want a lot. They value their free time and only want a couple a month, with a few of them turning into mistress-type arrangements. If they get 25 dates in a year and they hook two of them, they are set, and that is what they are looking to do in many cases. My AFT did that, and her eventual sponsor has a net worth approaching $1B. He wound up taking her on business trips with him around the world, and giving her enough cash that she was a woman of leisure when not traveling. That was the end state she was shooting for, and she only needed one. Her initial (before meeting him) $25K/night price tag limited her to five or six clients a year, but it was how she quickly screened out the guys who weren't what she was looking for.
The thing that makes me question her situation is her web site. The ones I know in that stratosphere are marketing two things above their looks (which have to be good of course):
#1 by a long shot is discretion. They would not have web sites like hers.
#2 is that they are great high-level dinner-candy, not only arm candy.
I hope she gets what she is looking for.
PS: I do detect some sour grapes on this thread, the "Yea, she looks really hot, but I bet she has a small menu and a bad attitude". Maybe, but just as easily maybe not.