I called an independent provider, and literally the first thing she asked was if I was black, since she doesn't work with them. I'm white, but it honestly rubbed me the wrong way. It's her practice, and she 100% has the right to choose who she massages and who she doesn't, but I thought the whole thing was kind of icky. Thoughts?
-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
How do y'all feel about providers not working with certain races?
- Thread starter jo60000668
- Start date
She definitely can choose who she wants to be with.and not to be with.
: 136113"]I called an independent provider, and literally the first thing she asked was if I was black, since she doesn't work with them. I'm white, but it honestly rubbed me the wrong way. It's her practice, and she 100% has the right to choose who she massages and who she doesn't, but I thought the whole thing was kind
: 136113"]I called an independent provider, and literally the first thing she asked was if I was black, since she doesn't work with them. I'm white, but it honestly rubbed me the wrong way. It's her practice, and she 100% has the right to choose who she massages and who she doesn't, but I thought the whole thing was kind
So, ask yourself this: Does it bother you the same way if it says "No AA below <insert arbitrary age here>"? On the woke/PC scale, that is both racial AND age discrimination. But it is also Free Association and many times I see it, it also has the disclaimer "due to past experiences..........." before it. Is she being racist/ageist or just using learned wisdom to protect herself from future harm based on past events?
I get it. You see a hotty that matches what you want and find yourself disqualified based on whatever criteria the provider may have that excludes you, and it sucks. Racial, age based, BS political nonsense of all kinds, whatever.............. But it's also the ultimate example of the Free Market, and you are just as free to take your business elsewhere as they are to expand or limit their customer base by whatever criteria they want. And both sides eat the consequences of their choices.
Want to change it? Get it legalized and then regulated to shit like the govt does to everything else...............then watch how fast things change, for better or worse, and prices shoot through the roof..............
I get it. You see a hotty that matches what you want and find yourself disqualified based on whatever criteria the provider may have that excludes you, and it sucks. Racial, age based, BS political nonsense of all kinds, whatever.............. But it's also the ultimate example of the Free Market, and you are just as free to take your business elsewhere as they are to expand or limit their customer base by whatever criteria they want. And both sides eat the consequences of their choices.
Want to change it? Get it legalized and then regulated to shit like the govt does to everything else...............then watch how fast things change, for better or worse, and prices shoot through the roof..............
Being of the AA decent I have to say, as others have, it’s her choice. I’ve had providers tell me no AA due to imagined size, past non pleasant experiences, etc. I don’t get upset as most (most) will have a reason for their decisions and ultimately it is their choice who they want sweating on top of them. It’s better to know upfront than waste time showing up and getting the news.
While it's understandable why someone would feel some kind of way after reading that in an ad, I'd much rather them be completely completely honest upfront than me give them my money to receive poor or incomplete service because they're racist in a quiet kind of way. Plus I'd rather not patronize a racist anyway.
In general, I agree, but you are assuming that prosecutors, who are political appointees in NJ, are caring only about Return on Investment for budget dollars and never engage in selective enforcement based on the political considerations that get them the jobs. In the end, they answer to their masters agenda.............and the law/Constitution be damned if they are in conflict.
All that being said, there are plenty of other things that more accurately scream "scam" and "LE"..............I would be hesitant relying on this factor as one of them.
All that being said, there are plenty of other things that more accurately scream "scam" and "LE"..............I would be hesitant relying on this factor as one of them.
