-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Gisella vs Aurora vs Koreanna
- Thread starter digdug69
- Start date
I know I saw Anna Tang
I know I saw this video you mentioned
I know I don't think it looks like her
I will tell you what I am going to do. I am seeing her yet again. I am going to pull your link, just the link. I am going to show it to her and ask her if it is her. Then I will have her text me yes it is me no it is not. Then I will post that text. So don't tell me what I know, or your friends on here know, or you, lets get it straight from the horses mouth and settle this bullshit once and for all.
As an independent third-party, I think what's causing the possible animosity and tempers to flare is that some of your posts have a "I know her better than any of you" type of aspect to it. Not saying it is intentional on your part, but it's very well possible that she did some videos in the past that you're not aware of, or it was awhile ago and it's sort of hard to tell. Especially when presented with seemingly clear evidence.
As one of the guys mentioned, the tats DO match exactly (a very intricate design, I might add), and it's probably very unlikely that two Asian women have that same exact tattoo.
As a hobbyist (and not a mod), I say it's her...an earlier version of her before she got other tattoos that you can see on her Tryst page, but not the earlier video. You also said "the girl in your video is white", which is definitely not the case, if you actually did watch the video. You either didn't watch it, or if you did and STILL think she's white...well, get your eyes checked, along with your colon.
As one of the guys mentioned, the tats DO match exactly (a very intricate design, I might add), and it's probably very unlikely that two Asian women have that same exact tattoo.
As a hobbyist (and not a mod), I say it's her...an earlier version of her before she got other tattoos that you can see on her Tryst page, but not the earlier video. You also said "the girl in your video is white", which is definitely not the case, if you actually did watch the video. You either didn't watch it, or if you did and STILL think she's white...well, get your eyes checked, along with your colon.
H I appreciate your input , candor , and experience . However you are walking in in the middle - there is a group of people on here some old timers some hanger on’s, who criticize and jump on every review and the OP , not just me , others too - it’s the same 7-8 mongers every time - they chime in with criticism of the reviews picking at the authenticity- it doesn’t end with my reviews it’s every other post or thread - you had to shut one down of late - all the same guys carrying on
I’ll end this right now - I’m putting all these guys in the ignore list and.
you’re all right it’s Anna Tang - that concludes our business - if I write a review or a thread I will not be able to see what you write nor will I respond -
I think H I’ll take the high road - I’m certainly not looking to stir any pots .
thanks for weighing in
I’ll end this right now - I’m putting all these guys in the ignore list and.
you’re all right it’s Anna Tang - that concludes our business - if I write a review or a thread I will not be able to see what you write nor will I respond -
I think H I’ll take the high road - I’m certainly not looking to stir any pots .
thanks for weighing in
I wish you quick recovery.
I honestly didn't want to make any statement about knowing her better, but the only thing that triggered my response was someone labeling her as "white"
Apart from the tattoos, the hair is pretty much the same. If anything, she just looks more fit now, but this video is definitely not a decade nor decades old.
I honestly didn't want to make any statement about knowing her better, but the only thing that triggered my response was someone labeling her as "white"
Apart from the tattoos, the hair is pretty much the same. If anything, she just looks more fit now, but this video is definitely not a decade nor decades old.
A few things...first of all, this isn't a review thread, and not even a thread you started...it's about G vs. C. vs A. You're the one who actually brought up AT in the first place, and at a considerable higher price point than all 3 aforementioned providers.
Second, the discussion about AT started off quite innocuously...one member thought he had seen a video, and provided a link. Your immediate reaction to it was denial...that it isn't her, and you were quite adamant about it. Clearly, you were wrong.
Did that mean one of the members can call you delusional? Perhaps not, and maybe he could have chosen a better word, but I don't feel that it was a personal attack. Maybe he wasn't being soft and cuddly, but your strong and immediate denial, along with some statements that you made ("she's never done a video" "the girl in the video is white and not Asian", as a member who saw her in person, kind of welcomed it. Then you retaliated by calling a member a loser.
One of the members replied to a comment about AT that you started, and you refused to accept it, and when presented with the video, it was clear to me that you either didn't watch it, or put on rose-tinted glasses and just outright rejected, in the face of overwhelmingly solid proof. So what kind of reaction were you expecting??
If I'm being 100% frank, as a hobbyist myself, you just lost some credibility in my eyes...and that will cause me (and I'm sure other members) to take your reviews with a grain of salt. Also as a hobbyist, the result is that you forced ME to come to the opinion that you were a)white knighting for AT, b)not very accurate in your portrayals, and c)clearly don't want, nor can handle the opinion of any member if they differ from YOURS.
Here's the thing...you say it's the same 7-8 members, but nearly every review or post that you make, you run into "problems" with other members. And it's not just the same 7-8 guys...it's with quite a few of them, and even with myself as a mod, in the past. So I don't believe it's a recurring problem with the same 7-8 guys...if I were you, I'd reflect on what the common denominator here is? I don't think it's intentional on your part, but you stir the pot with your posts, and maybe your style/language/misconstrued perception of comments.
This is a site for men...sometimes, conversations and discussions will get heated. If you can't handle a bit of heat, especially when you were clearly in the wrong, perhaps the site isn't for you...not every discussion will give everyone the warm and fuzzies. Also, you're a grown ass adult, and at least 45 years old at that (since you're prepping for a colonoscopy), and you were wrong here about AT...I think you need to apologize to the guys here (again, not speaking from my mod point of view), and eat some humble pie, instead of complaining that it's not your fault and blaming others. Take it like a man...you made a mistake, admit it, accept it, and apologize for it, and then move on...and certainly not whine that other kids are bullying you.
Maybe in the first place, when first presented with the video, this conversation would have take a MUCH different turn had you said something like "oh, I didn't know about it...let me take a look (and actually take a look)" or "I think we should take it down to protect her privacy" or something similar. Think about that.
Second, the discussion about AT started off quite innocuously...one member thought he had seen a video, and provided a link. Your immediate reaction to it was denial...that it isn't her, and you were quite adamant about it. Clearly, you were wrong.
Did that mean one of the members can call you delusional? Perhaps not, and maybe he could have chosen a better word, but I don't feel that it was a personal attack. Maybe he wasn't being soft and cuddly, but your strong and immediate denial, along with some statements that you made ("she's never done a video" "the girl in the video is white and not Asian", as a member who saw her in person, kind of welcomed it. Then you retaliated by calling a member a loser.
One of the members replied to a comment about AT that you started, and you refused to accept it, and when presented with the video, it was clear to me that you either didn't watch it, or put on rose-tinted glasses and just outright rejected, in the face of overwhelmingly solid proof. So what kind of reaction were you expecting??
If I'm being 100% frank, as a hobbyist myself, you just lost some credibility in my eyes...and that will cause me (and I'm sure other members) to take your reviews with a grain of salt. Also as a hobbyist, the result is that you forced ME to come to the opinion that you were a)white knighting for AT, b)not very accurate in your portrayals, and c)clearly don't want, nor can handle the opinion of any member if they differ from YOURS.
Here's the thing...you say it's the same 7-8 members, but nearly every review or post that you make, you run into "problems" with other members. And it's not just the same 7-8 guys...it's with quite a few of them, and even with myself as a mod, in the past. So I don't believe it's a recurring problem with the same 7-8 guys...if I were you, I'd reflect on what the common denominator here is? I don't think it's intentional on your part, but you stir the pot with your posts, and maybe your style/language/misconstrued perception of comments.
This is a site for men...sometimes, conversations and discussions will get heated. If you can't handle a bit of heat, especially when you were clearly in the wrong, perhaps the site isn't for you...not every discussion will give everyone the warm and fuzzies. Also, you're a grown ass adult, and at least 45 years old at that (since you're prepping for a colonoscopy), and you were wrong here about AT...I think you need to apologize to the guys here (again, not speaking from my mod point of view), and eat some humble pie, instead of complaining that it's not your fault and blaming others. Take it like a man...you made a mistake, admit it, accept it, and apologize for it, and then move on...and certainly not whine that other kids are bullying you.
Maybe in the first place, when first presented with the video, this conversation would have take a MUCH different turn had you said something like "oh, I didn't know about it...let me take a look (and actually take a look)" or "I think we should take it down to protect her privacy" or something similar. Think about that.
Sir
For you to infer that I am here shilling for someone is disrespectful - in the words of the late Howard Costello “ I call them the way I see them”
I have my favorites here no doubt we all do- and that’s what they are “ my favorites” I neither profit from nor write anything on here for my own personal gain - I resent the inference . If I defend a provider it’s usually because some sophomoric individual starts trash talking - I just don’t like it - don’t read into it that’s all it is
I will continue to write reviews , real reviews , about people I actually saw- I’d say at least 30 percent of the reviews on here are pickup reviews - promulgated to maintain privileges .
For the record
I’m an ex army ranger helped evacuate the US Embassy in then Saigon so really , I’m not looking for advice on an AMP site - it’s your job - noted let’s leave it at that
I’m 69 this was my fourth colonoscopy- btw the new age to get one is now 40 as younger guys seem to have advanced problems earlier - you would be wise to get one
Have a blessed day
And again, you're twisting my words...I never said nor claimed that you were a shill. I said you were a white knight (as in, no financial motive). And that's exactly what I mean when I said you stir things up with your posts.
As an example, here's a rebuttal to your sweeping and misleading statement about colonoscopies...it's age 45 for your first one for an average risk adult with no symptoms, polyps or IBD. It's 40 years old if you have family history/higher risk, or 10 years younger than an affected family member, whichever comes first. But you know better, right?
Regardless, thank you for your service.
As an example, here's a rebuttal to your sweeping and misleading statement about colonoscopies...it's age 45 for your first one for an average risk adult with no symptoms, polyps or IBD. It's 40 years old if you have family history/higher risk, or 10 years younger than an affected family member, whichever comes first. But you know better, right?
Regardless, thank you for your service.
I guess my doctor a top gastroenterologist and the nurse yesterday were wrong - they told me 40 after my procedure - family history is one thing, alcohol and drug use another , high fat diets and processed food consumption another at least that’s what they told me - I don’t smoke , do drugs , or drink , and still I get polyps - most people do . Only 20% of people are clean with none following a procedure - my first one was scary - I had a stalked 3.7 cm - they did surgery it was benign - I had five smaller one. All benign . I attribute it to booze - since I stopped I had a few baby ones . Why take a chance ? The five years between 40-45 could be life and death.
I guess you are more up on the lingo here than I am - to me a white knight - the inference is they have a nefarious motive - I don’t - a shill is a shill . I was not aware of the difference between a white knight and a shill - neither sounds very complimentary.
I think we have covered this in depth - don’t you ?
I guess you are more up on the lingo here than I am - to me a white knight - the inference is they have a nefarious motive - I don’t - a shill is a shill . I was not aware of the difference between a white knight and a shill - neither sounds very complimentary.
I think we have covered this in depth - don’t you ?
