Edit Rejected Reviews

[fffinster]

I've seen a lot of duplicate reviews lately. The common theme seems to be "my review got rejected, so here it is again with more information" --- perhaps if we could edit our rejected review for reconsideration rather than posting it again as a new one with updates, that would help keep the reviews forums cleaner. What do you folks think?

 

[KittyHawk]

That would help but my own personal favorite is to read the instructions now printed with the different steps and proofread and edit before I post.

 

[societyboy]

Or perhaps they could send you a private message before they reject it letting you know what's wrong so you can go in and fix it without having to resubmit.

 

[oldhorndog53]

topjimmy was quite clear with what members need to do when a review is rejected. The last sentence really says it all.

“If you're not trying for private access and your review gets rejected you can always leave it as is, but if you wanted to earn credit, you can still make corrections and earn the access. One way is to RESUBMIT the CORRECTED version of your review and let it pass through the queue again. If you choose this option ,you'll need to report your old rejected review to the mod staff and ask that it be removed as you will be posting an updated one. If it's something simple like a missing name or phone number or other small detail, you can PM that to the mod who rejected your review and ask that it get edited in. Mods can do that and then manually issue credit. Just work with the mod behind the scenes and more often than not we can guide you in correcting the issues so you can earn credit for your review. Take note, though. All of these options take time. Could take days. With that in mind, the best practice is to make sure all the criteria is met within your review before posting so you can earn credit the first time around.”

 

[Bultaco103]

Many reviews being rejected are for not enough details in the physical description. Even though it is an obviously detailed description like thin, pretty, maybe 50 with long hair, that gets rejected. You have to guess the height, weight cup size, describe the length of hair - shoulder length, etc.

I am now putting in anything I can think of including teeth, eye color (brown) clothing color, lip thickness, nose/ear size, tattoos, piercings, jewelry, English abilities.
putting up detailed reviews takes some time. Doing it twice is really a waste of time.

I personally suck at guessing height, weight, age, cup size so even though I now add this stuff please don’t think it is a fact. Wild guess. They all look cute and 50+ to me.

 

[geekdmb]

State of the chest hair like shaved or unshaved

Many reviews being rejected are for not enough details in the physical description. Even though it is an obviously detailed description like thin, pretty, maybe 50 with long hair, that gets rejected. You have to guess the height, weight cup size, describe the length of hair - shoulder length, etc.

I am now putting in anything I can think of including teeth, eye color (brown) clothing color, lip thickness, nose/ear size, tattoos, piercings, jewelry, English abilities.
putting up detailed reviews takes some time. Doing it twice is really a waste of time.

I personally suck at guessing height, weight, age, cup size so even though I now add this stuff please don’t think it is a fact. Wild guess. They all look cute and 50+ to me.

 

[markkennedy]

The description with details can be important, maybe just for one person, maybe some dude next year searches for "smells like smoke", and finds the review you write that says the girl's hair smells like she smokes. Or you like nipple piercings, and you search for this and find it because someone was thoughtful to put this info in review. Can be super obtuse with it of course, putting hilarious things like how pointy her elbows are, but can be thoughtful and things that you think someone may have interest to know about will be helpful to the rest of us. If dudes find ladies who have stubbly axila, pls post this as "certain" members may have interest in this.

Anyway to OP point, yes it would be cleaner to allow rejection to include editing functionality, most boards have this feature.

 

[Voodoo66]

Hey guys, as far as the description goes we are now made to enforce the rule that has been there since day 1. Reason being, some seem to think mom bod, luscious, tasty vag are legitimate descriptions lol.
We cannot alert a member to change the information before rejecting it. That would be too time consuming and have us receive countless email daily. We get upwards of 200 reviews daily and more on weekends. Have fun out here. Here’s what TJ is looking for.

 

[KittyHawk]

Hey guys, as far as the description goes we are now made to enforce the rule that has been there since day 1. Reason being, some seem to think mom bod, luscious, tasty vag are legitimate descriptions lol.
We cannot alert a member to change the information before rejecting it. That would be too time consuming and have us receive countless email daily. We get upwards of 200 reviews daily and more on weekends. Have fun out here. Here’s what TJ is looking for. View attachment 46104

I understand the importance of an accurate description but my first thought on reading the above was that I needed to walk in to a session carrying a clipboard and tape measure.

 

[Bultaco103]

I understand the importance of an accurate description but my first thought on reading the above was that I needed to walk in to a session carrying a clipboard and tape measure.

Yet if you can get her to sit on your hornometer it should pick up all the key stats

 

[kantuchdis]

Mods have pm'd me with specific suggestions to make the review "approval worthy" - and offered to make the corrections if I supplied the info - I have NO complaints with that kind of camaraderie!