-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Avoiding LEO
- Thread starter Tityfortaty
- Start date
All I could hypothetically say is learn what LE needs for charges and conviction, and avoid the warning signs. The key factor is a clear offer of sexual activity for compensation...................and YES, we can argue all day that ALL relationships that include sex, even marriages, have that factor.
So, if they seem like they are direct avoiding THAT line of talk, prob legit. Same with if they refuse any early talk of numbers...............
Also, think a little about evidence collection. If they insist on communication where it retains a record.................could be a red flag. Unrecorded voice communication can be hearsay or "he said, she said" and is ripe for miscommunication and misunderstanding. But in black and white is far more damning.
I would think the "too good to be true" is more indicative of a scam/robbery then LE..................
Bottom line is discretion is the better part of valor and while the little head may run your show, let the big head have input.
All hypothetically of course...................
So, if they seem like they are direct avoiding THAT line of talk, prob legit. Same with if they refuse any early talk of numbers...............
Also, think a little about evidence collection. If they insist on communication where it retains a record.................could be a red flag. Unrecorded voice communication can be hearsay or "he said, she said" and is ripe for miscommunication and misunderstanding. But in black and white is far more damning.
I would think the "too good to be true" is more indicative of a scam/robbery then LE..................
Bottom line is discretion is the better part of valor and while the little head may run your show, let the big head have input.
All hypothetically of course...................
All good points here, I have gone with mostly reviewed providers but that group is not that large, and even then, a review can be written by anyone.
Zippy has a point, if there is no evidence, where is the crime....I like to think Im a ninja, but shoot, Ive seen plenty dateline episodes with my S/O lol! I think I might just need a break from mongering.
Zippy has a point, if there is no evidence, where is the crime....I like to think Im a ninja, but shoot, Ive seen plenty dateline episodes with my S/O lol! I think I might just need a break from mongering.
some good points on here, only thing I can ad is that several years back a buddy of mine went to see someone who not only had reviews but who he had also seen before. Well, she was busted and they set up a reverse sting using her phone and ads. He walked right into it and was arrested for solicitation, he got off sort of light in court with fines but was transported to police headquarters, spent several hours there, had to hire an attorney and the press release is still on the internet today if you search his name which has messed up some aspects of things in his life obviously. It was an upscale hotel in the CNJ area. Although not typical or the norm, this can obviously happen.
It's possible, but just like NJ weed nonsense they tend to screw things up far more then they fix because the "tax and regulation" legalized criminals see dollar signs instead of responsible freedom. Plus, when you add in the "trafficking" factor along with the illegal immigration stuff, it's a big area to try and unscrew up (pun intended) the mess they already made....................and "more of the same" stupidity by the folks who made the initial problem is never the solution except to their pockets.
As you know NJ would tax the air that you breath if they had a way to do it, problem is no politician in Trenton wants to be the one to introduce a bill for legalization/decriminalization of prostitution. There's just too much downside for introducing that kind of legislation, it would basically be political suicide to bring it up. These people in Trenton have a cushy lifestyle and aren't willing to risk throwing that out over mongers and providers. They want their votes and donations from the churchy people and just keep the status quo of being 'outraged' over sex crimes and human trafficking.
It took us way too long to get marijuana and sports betting legalized but weed and gambling are not sex, its just an uncomfortable topic most wont touch with a 10 ft. pole. I don't think we will ever see it happen in NJ in our lifetimes
It took us way too long to get marijuana and sports betting legalized but weed and gambling are not sex, its just an uncomfortable topic most wont touch with a 10 ft. pole. I don't think we will ever see it happen in NJ in our lifetimes