Is TER generally considered more reliable than the reviews on this site? Saw a review on Minji the other day that put her in the 20-30s range.
Age on TER is problematic. It's set by the first reviewer rather than average age in all reviews or at least the first 5 since they don't show overall rating until 5 reviews. Also, if first few reviews show high ratings, they are suspect shill unless from known providers. Even then reviews tend to be overly positive on looks and age if service is good.
Regarding review reliability, it's counter intuitive.
I tend to think ampreviews reviews might be more accurate because of comments potentially challenging review assertions, but I may be wrong since I haven't verified. However, I do know, the comments and dialog are usually most accurate. Guys will comment on negative stuff, even if they had so-so experience (reviews are mostly written for good experiences). I know one guy who never writes reviews, but is dead on with comments. It's easier for the PO to figure out who you are on ampreviews from your review which is published immediately. But some guys (myself) will write a review for every new provider they see, good, bad, or middle-ing.
Also, in comments you can do comparative stuff - greater, less than using <, > symbols. Comparison tends be more relevent and easier than describing how fat, how curvy, age, etc. Although tits and ass should be described since some guys like MM pointy tits (like me) and others prefer round natural looking tits.