SKS was one of my Favorite Orgs. to go to. If their your 9- 10's stay with them ,I was just giving my OP on your ratings FBSA. on their reviews that they have out there,like on TER, no one scores four 10's and barely 9's . if you conpare them to RA's in the past. many would say these RA's would score lower.
I agree that in the past, the best RA's seemed better looking, despite the tendency to remember the past thru rose colored spectacles.
But also, the past service quality seemed worse than today. I think service quality reflects whether the provider enjoys her job and loves sex. In the past, I recall sex with stunners, that had so-so service. Many didn't seem to like their job. Certainly, with newbie and many experienced mongers, it's all about getting off with a sexy good looker.
In the past, I don't think providers understood, that desirable
repeat visits were driven by service and connection (rapport), but initial visits were always determined by looks, reason that pics are always very sexually attractive.
Now days, many providers get that if at the door, they immediately dfk or pull dow pants to start bj (I've seen an uptick in this behavior), the monger is less likely to notice the providers looks, but reports good service. Good service and connection always makes the provider better looking. On TER ratings, there is a strong correlation between service and looks.
