-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Review: LSC Vinny
- Thread starter JamesMcg
- Start date
the photos on the website is common information we all have. I don’t understand why so many reviews including this one don’t explicitly use it in the review. It should be the first thing they are required to address. how is it that people can write a review and not comment directly on whether the photo is accurate. Isn’t that the first thing we all want to know? is it her? Is it her from 10 years ago? does it resemble her In face or body? If so which one is most representative? Or is it completely fake? It’s helpful to hear this even if it’s been said before to get confirmation from multiple sources. So what is the answer in this case???
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
the photos on the website is common information we all have. I don’t understand why so many reviews including this one don’t explicitly use it in the review. It should be the first thing they are required to address. how is it that people can write a review and not comment directly on whether the photo is accurate. Isn’t that the first thing we all want to know? is it her? Is it her from 10 years ago? does it resemble her In face or body? If so which one is most representative? Or is it completely fake? It’s helpful to hear this even if it’s been said before to get confirmation from multiple sources. So what is the answer in this case???
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
" She's a bit taller than advertised I believe, and the photos make her look way younger than what she actually is. Photos put her around early 20s, and she's probably early to mid 30s."
I don't need to spell out every detail. This alone tells you that the pics aren't really accurate and I was disappointed. There's no point putting my consensus as to which picture is most accurate when none are really close at all, it's glammed up photos of her (probably) in her early 20s with bad photoshop and if she sent me these photos and I seen her in real life, i'd be disappointed. How much do I have to spell this out? It's plainly obvious so how does this help? I already commented on her MMs. Again, comprehension is key. The fact that I was disappointed, photos aren't accurate, and for guys like me who only want DDG women or close, the fact that I said I wouldn't sleep with her for free basically says she's not worth seeing in my opinion. I only recommend her if you can tolerate someone older with plastic surgery with a fit-ish body, MMs, and gives great service. Do you need me to spell more out for you?
Go see her yourself if you're that concerned, but judging on your post history, you don't contribute much at all to the forums so please stop demanding others to cater to your needs. Go write your own review.
the photos on the website is common information we all have. I don’t understand why so many reviews including this one don’t explicitly use it in the review. It should be the first thing they are required to address. how is it that people can write a review and not comment directly on whether the photo is accurate. Isn’t that the first thing we all want to know? is it her? Is it her from 10 years ago? does it resemble her In face or body? If so which one is most representative? Or is it completely fake? It’s helpful to hear this even if it’s been said before to get confirmation from multiple sources. So what is the answer in this case???
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
that’s much more helpful than you “happy” because I don’t know what makes you happy. Subjective details like that are hard to interpret than objective details like she’s taller than reported on the profile.
I think there often is too much emphasis on irrelevant details. Who cares whether she’s 28 or 34 as if someone could reliably tell? Who cares whether the reviewer made her cum?
saying I’m extremely picky and wouldnt fuck her for free is worthless because on one hand your saying you have extremely high standards so how is a person to take that. the Objective details help so much more.
good mm? Bad mm? Natural? make sense. Firm droopy info. made sense. If it looks good and feels real why do you care so much about classifying it to the point of making her feel self conscious? You are not there to do an medical checkup.
I appreciate the reviews but I feel so many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers Especially when the sites can be misleading.
You wrote "many reviewers have lost sight of that it is for the purpose of others receiving information to rationally select one of the providers"
This statement makes no sense - I've never made a decision to see someone based on one review. Your expectations are unrealistic. The only "requirements" here are what the owners ask, pictures aren't of one them, would be nice, but I've come to expect most can't tell give a reliable answer. And most can't tell if someone has MM or tell a gals age within 5 to 7 years. Scales of Face/Body are all over the map, as seen by some of the other threads where some give high scores but others gives lower scores. Best one can do is get several opinions/reviews for a provider. I like the details - don't speak for everyone.
Rational? I think this hobby can be quite the opposite of rational. Not picking life insurance here - though I guess you might be trying to