@Sidneyfalco, sure, they might consider fet a sort of gateway? i certainly wouldn't consider younger an advantage tho. aside from an immature approach, when a provider thinks that they can autopilot on obvious prettiness, that's the absolute worst except for fake pics. but agreed about the main point for guys stuck in the "would-she-or-would-she-not?" negotiations at footspot and footpad. (unless you just gotta meet one of them and you agree to those terms like the reviewer, then that's totally fair. i just want to broadcast to guys that those NOT the only choices.)
@6LGen4, that probably means in the context of feet fet or domme. like why take that chance at a place blatantly billed for fet? unless madly desiring a certain provider, you can call another place where no doubts and where the lady herself can verify that easily.....and again, for guys actually into fet, that's why I'd rec a FBSM place where you can email the individual ladies first and they can tell you what they accommodate. by default that excludes Asian places (which can entail communication difficulties already) and that excludes places where you can't tell from pictures what they accommodate, and where the reception lady often answers the phone clueless about specific requests. then what? if you'd like chancing that anyway cuz someone's pics that enticing, just expect the odds that they might not handle fet requests very gracefully. or expect that might require a few sessions for developing. sometimes absolutely worth that.