AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

Review: Fangfang

R

Retired032824

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,373
Reviews: 17
Joined
#23
#23
CFP said:
Kim is either directly or indirectly responsible for more wild fun than I have any right to have ever experienced in two lifetimes. For that reason I'm reluctant to drag this conversation on too much further. She was the gold standard for mamasans during her long tenure at PH and it was a great loss to all of us when that fell apart.

Hope the following puts this to bed:
I probably should have just communicated with her privately about this and also should have booked with her directly. Why didn't I? I don't know. I was drawn in through the strange reviews here not the BookerK site. But the fact remains that Fangfang is listed there and especially since Kim as BookK is more of a curator than a mamasan and doesn't need to have a stable of girls as she did with a brick and morter spot, there's no compelling reason to recommend or book a girl that is problematic. I don't think any of us here disagree that Fangfang is problematic.
Click to expand...
All true, however, she is like a broker in those situations. She does have her own place in Jersey City as listed on her website. When and only when you book with Kim through her booker site, is she involved. The compelling reason to truthfully recommend someone to you or contrarily refrain from doing such is (a) legitimacy towards her referrals and (b) she is involved from a fiduciary standpoint when you book with her as opposed to going direct. Therein lies the difference, at least in my opinion. I think we all agree that the Fang is on the pay no mind list. That is all that matters. Chalk it up to experience.
 
R

Retired031424

Registered Member
Messages: 1,290
Reviews: 44
Joined
#29
#29
wackadoo said:
All true, however, she is like a broker in those situations. She does have her own place in Jersey City as listed on her website. When and only when you book with Kim through her booker site, is she involved. The compelling reason to truthfully recommend someone to you or contrarily refrain from doing such is (a) legitimacy towards her referrals and (b) she is involved from a fiduciary standpoint when you book with her as opposed to going direct. Therein lies the difference, at least in my opinion. I think we all agree that the Fang is on the pay no mind list. That is all that matters. Chalk it up to experience.
Click to expand...
I should ignore the above but for some reason can't let it sit.

Do you get regular emails from BookerK? I got one today. Guess who's on it. SMH.
 
R

Retired032824

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,373
Reviews: 17
Joined
#30
#30
CFP said:
I should ignore the above but for some reason can't let it sit.

Do you get regular emails from BookerK? I got one today. Guess who's on it. SMH.
Click to expand...
Not sure if this is for me. Is it? Yes shake your head. She is on it... if this message was for me, not sure why you should ignore it. No worries have a nice day
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top