AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

"Raw/BB Sex with Provider"

Already21

Registered Member
Messages: 51
Reviews: 2
Joined
No, any drug has side effects and HIV risk for heterosexual males that don't give or receive anal sex (or have sexual contact with IV drug users or inject themselves) is incredibly low.

The virus is fragile and doesn't transmit well via vagina. Magic Johnson got HIV because of Russian Roulette. There is a 5% chance of getting it from normal heterosexual sex. But if you have unprotected sex 100 times in a year with 100 different Women every year for 20 years then yeah you have a good chance of contracting it. Especially in 80s and 90s when detection and drug research was inferior. And he lies about what type of Women he was with. Another question is whether he is fully heterosexual. 90% of Men who have ever contracted the virus either were Gay, had exposure to IV drugs or were infected by contaminated blood.

But from any one encounter your chances today are very low.

Clarify that 5% statistic. Studies have shown less than a 5% transmission rate among married couples with one seropositive and the other negative after one year.
The CDC puts a 1/2500 risk of transmission female to male in a single act, which if translated to spa girls and thier customers, would be the % of working girls who are infected times 1/2500. Even if the % was as high as 10%, that translates to a 1/25,000 risk per event for all males having unprotected sex. But that risk factor of 1/2500 is global. Individual factors could make the risk substantially higher or lower.
 

Rombulous

Check It
Messages: 1,421
Reviews: 1
Joined
Clarify that 5% statistic. Studies have shown less than a 5% transmission rate among married couples with one seropositive and the other negative after one year.
The CDC puts a 1/2500 risk of transmission female to male in a single act, which if translated to spa girls and thier customers, would be the % of working girls who are infected times 1/2500. Even if the % was as high as 10%, that translates to a 1/25,000 risk per event for all males having unprotected sex. But that risk factor of 1/2500 is global. Individual factors could make the risk substantially higher or lower.
Add in age and stats are probably even more favorable. Older Women who have it are unlikely to provide and more likely to know their status. If they are positive, more likely to adhere to treatment which can make the virus unable to transmit to the partner.

Younger Women are less likely to know their status, more likely to do drugs and fuck bi-sexual or Gay Men, or receive unprotected anal sex.

This is another reason I prefer MILF. Statistically I am more concerned with Asymptomatic Super Gonorrhea.
 

sept99ten

Registered Member
Messages: 513
Reviews: 30
Joined
8 pages and no one has any insight on confirmed testing practices of AMPs? Does anyone know for a fact that AMPs (not small random street ones, I mean the popular spots) require regular testing? Are they using PReP as a precautionary measure?
 

Rombulous

Check It
Messages: 1,421
Reviews: 1
Joined
8 pages and no one has any insight on confirmed testing practices of AMPs? Does anyone know for a fact that AMPs (not small random street ones, I mean the popular spots) require regular testing? Are they using PReP as a precautionary measure?
HIV risk is negligible. Follow the advice I stated above and you'll be fine. Judge each provider on a case by case basis. In general don't go raw unless she's working in a legit place where they don't store condoms/lubricant.
 

shehan

Registered Member
Messages: 31
Reviews: 6
Joined
Had a girl pop it in while on top and I proceeded to launch her off of me. She was like what's wrong? I thought you would like. It was wet and tight but thankfully no damage to report I
 

Rombulous

Check It
Messages: 1,421
Reviews: 1
Joined
I don’t care what race anyone going raw is looking for a visit to their local pharmacist.
The annoying part is no it's not a guarantee. It would be so much easier if you knew in advance. Unprotected sex is not guaranteed to lead to infection even if the Woman is infected. There are multiple variables involved including circumcision status, her menstrual cycle, her hygiene, your immune system, her immune system, whether she has symptoms, how long she's been infected etc.
 

Rombulous

Check It
Messages: 1,421
Reviews: 1
Joined
Anyone went raw with the ladies in dresses by 88 and Roosevelt?
Not worth it.

If you're going to risk it all , do it with a Woman you'd be proud to literally die for...

As in on your death bed you show a picture of her to your grandson and he gets a hard on or at least provides a nod of approval!
 

Talo

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,942
Reviews: 33
Joined
This thread is pretty long and not sure if you guys may have touched on another point of discussion. I was part of a few different SugarDaddy private groups, were guys would exchange tips and leeds on SBs (Googlegroup, discord, etc.). One thing that came up in every one of those groups multiple times was guys catching something from there SB. It was much rarer to get a pregnancy scare but not unheard of. Back to the STDs, just from those groups it seems like STDs happened all the damn time in the SB world. If there was a group of a dozen guys at least 3-4 would at some point be warning the others about a chick he got sores from or something. The obvious difference is how prevalent BBFS is in the SB world, but just bringing it up in case others may have noticed the same thing.
 

joediamond65

Registered Member
Messages: 179
Reviews: 2
Joined
Anyone who goes raw is asking for trouble. You are all educated adults and know the consequences. After the heat of passion subsides, and you are in your doctors office to discuss, whatever you picked up from this ho, he will stare at you, hand you a few pamphlets to read and shake his head. Are any of the consequences that might occur, disease, unwanted pregnancy, child support payments for 17% of your gross income etc. worth a moment of pleasure? Think it over. In time you may find that wanting is far more pleasurable than having.

Going in raw, no... there is no upside, it's all about R &R.. risk versus returns.
 

Talo

Review Contributor
Messages: 1,942
Reviews: 33
Joined
8 pages and no one has any insight on confirmed testing practices of AMPs? Does anyone know for a fact that AMPs (not small random street ones, I mean the popular spots) require regular testing? Are they using PReP as a precautionary measure?
I don't buy into what people say about AMPs requiring girls to get tested. It makes no sense and judging from what Ive seen after guys start reporting in that so and so gave me X, there is little consiquence if something happens. At worst the girl is fired and finds another place to work at. More often though nothing happens, or sometimes she will take a break from her main place and continue elswhere only to come back to her main place a few months later after everyone forgets. There really is no consequence for the house. What is guy going to do? Write bad reviews? Call the cops? These places are in constant danger of stings and random visits from health or other departments. They are prepared. As far as word getting out to the community, this has happend before and guess what those places are still alive and well with the same chicks working there.
 
Top