-
You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page
Question about Viola's Bora
- Thread starter KGirlLover
- Start date
Bora is one of my go-to gals whenever I feel horny and don't know who to choose. She's up there in the wild sex category. Great at riding and the bj is incredible. She always tries to get two pops from me, even though age is making me an one pop kind of guy. I've seen her at least 6-7 times already. In fact, after not hobbying for about 2 months, she was the first girl I went to go see. We had our up and down moments, but generally it was positive experiences. As for age, she's probably at least 30s. She's got the body of a 20 year old though.
A problem is that, with-out some type of visual reference as a comparison, (especially for those of us who do not have the opportunity for whatever reason, to have seen most of these women recently) there's no way to tell if one guys description of a woman in any way matches up with what my description would be. One guys definition of skinny might be nowhere near my definition of skinny. One guys definition of curvy booty might be "Geez, can she fit through a door?" fat butt to me. I've always appreciated photo's that showed a full-frontal view (full nude or not) of the woman standing next to something that has a standard size like a fridge or kitchen counter or a doorway.
Just looking at all the replies to the various reviews shows that there is no true consensus as to what we consider to be fit, skinny, athletic, overweight or curvy. Nothing wrong with that. I know a guy that the only thing that matters is boobs. Doesn't matter what the rest of her looks like, if she's got big boobs, she's hot.
Like I described earlier, my definition of spinner is no more than 5'3" and 110 pounds. Though 4'10" and 110 pounds is no longer spinner, but simply short and chunky. Of course, if I were 6 and a half feet tall and weighed 260, then my definition of spinner could be 4 inches taller and 25 pounds heavier. Same thing with age. If I had my choice, I would not pick any woman over 30 or so. Yet, there are others who don't seem too interested in anybody under 35. I will say that I'm extremely thankful to the guys who point out the older women using younger women photos.
It's all relative to each individual, so just making a comment that I think she's skinny doesn't hold much weight unless I can show everybody what my idea of skinny actually is.
I wish there was a way to convince these orgs to show pictures that are somewhat recent of the actual woman who will open the door as opposed to posting pictures of Chinese models or Korean IG stars that have never been to America. Seems like a Catch-22. If we decide not to support their business, they won't be able to bring in better talent and just cease to exist. But it we continue to support their business, there is no reason to bring in better talent.
Just looking at all the replies to the various reviews shows that there is no true consensus as to what we consider to be fit, skinny, athletic, overweight or curvy. Nothing wrong with that. I know a guy that the only thing that matters is boobs. Doesn't matter what the rest of her looks like, if she's got big boobs, she's hot.
Like I described earlier, my definition of spinner is no more than 5'3" and 110 pounds. Though 4'10" and 110 pounds is no longer spinner, but simply short and chunky. Of course, if I were 6 and a half feet tall and weighed 260, then my definition of spinner could be 4 inches taller and 25 pounds heavier. Same thing with age. If I had my choice, I would not pick any woman over 30 or so. Yet, there are others who don't seem too interested in anybody under 35. I will say that I'm extremely thankful to the guys who point out the older women using younger women photos.
It's all relative to each individual, so just making a comment that I think she's skinny doesn't hold much weight unless I can show everybody what my idea of skinny actually is.
I wish there was a way to convince these orgs to show pictures that are somewhat recent of the actual woman who will open the door as opposed to posting pictures of Chinese models or Korean IG stars that have never been to America. Seems like a Catch-22. If we decide not to support their business, they won't be able to bring in better talent and just cease to exist. But it we continue to support their business, there is no reason to bring in better talent.
No, the problem isn't the consensus, the problem is orgs posing as customers and pretending like the girl in question is the best thing since sliced bread, and mongers inflating scores for no reason. I got "banned" for stating the obvious and people got hurt feelings, but I'll have to say it again and again: most Bay Area mongers have literally no taste. I can't tell you how many times someone said a girl was fit and she wasn't. I can't tell how many times someone said she had a hot body but ended up being pudgy or stocky. This is why I rarely visit the AAMP and just have fun abroad.
getting banned is badge of honor, my man bach I saw her recently as well. In terms of looks, yes she has tattoos but not distracting. If you look at her legs or arms, you would say she's skinny.. not VF Angel skinny, but still skinny. I wouldn't call her athletic since there's no muscle tone to speak of. Also, she has no butt. As for age, given the Asian bonus, I would say she's in her 30s. Someone else mentioned heavy makeup, which is true, but again not distracting. I think in general, few would be disappointed with her looks, but obviously she's not perfect. I would say f7b7s8a6.
Great service for sure, so if you're considering it, go for it!
Great service for sure, so if you're considering it, go for it!
Right, the problem is monger behavior which needs to change. The orgs in certain markets know from experience that the little head takes over when a monger sees a hot good looking model or 10 year old photoshopped pics. When he shows up at the door and provider is not what's advertised, the little head is too horny to walk, and he doesn't want to get banned. Even at quality orgs I can only screen out undesirables from reviews, but then only repeat for 20%.
And, I think the reviewers failure to describe looks are worse than the org fake pics. They just say things like "I really liked her tits or ass", really informative - not! I have to scan about 10 experienced reviewers to glean anything useful, like "bit of a stomach pooch" or "thick but not fat". I can never get anything about shape of tits which are often well defined in womens mags, bra vendors. (Google shape of boobs.) I personally like usually mm tits that are conical with no droop. The size is less important than shape. The other thing experienced reviewers should do is to compare body parts of different providers. For example, I like Tina's tits and her ass, like Hera's tits, not her ass. I prefer small well shaped asses. I like taut stomachs (hard to find) and get turned off by any loose stomach flab or roll. All reviews should have plenty of specific physical details. Ideally, reviewers should have standardized images of different tits, asses, stomach, legs, facial shapes, etc. which they can reference with numbers, like an expansion on the "B" of FBSA.
And, I think the reviewers failure to describe looks are worse than the org fake pics. They just say things like "I really liked her tits or ass", really informative - not! I have to scan about 10 experienced reviewers to glean anything useful, like "bit of a stomach pooch" or "thick but not fat". I can never get anything about shape of tits which are often well defined in womens mags, bra vendors. (Google shape of boobs.) I personally like usually mm tits that are conical with no droop. The size is less important than shape. The other thing experienced reviewers should do is to compare body parts of different providers. For example, I like Tina's tits and her ass, like Hera's tits, not her ass. I prefer small well shaped asses. I like taut stomachs (hard to find) and get turned off by any loose stomach flab or roll. All reviews should have plenty of specific physical details. Ideally, reviewers should have standardized images of different tits, asses, stomach, legs, facial shapes, etc. which they can reference with numbers, like an expansion on the "B" of FBSA.
Bonnie I haven't seen, but thinking if trying her since she seems passionate. I don't have issue with her size, but curious what her tits shape and stomach is like. I've seen some descriptions that she had D MMs, but no description of shape -melon, conical, etc And, I've seen references to some sort of non-ideal thing with her stomach, but what - loose skin fold, etc.? This goes back to my previous comment about inadequate physical descriptions in reviews.