Politics Thread. All Political Debates and Rants go Here.

[Matawan3]

I’m saying any one that thinks the riots was justified should re-evaluate their oath of office. And those are not exclusively connected. You can question the electoral college results. That’s part of the procedure. Now it’s not just your knowledge of the law in question, it’s also your sense of logic.

Not according to 50 States Board of Electors. Funny how none of the States which Trump won had irregularities.

Okay, so you are admitting that Democrats are illegally trying to toss out Republican house members?

 

[Matawan3]

Nancy Pelosi inciting violence. Way more than Trump ever has. Remove her. Double standard is so glaring. Its pathetic.

 

[krideynyc]

This has to be a joke. The Democratic house is going to vote to impeach regardless of the law. If they brought forth an impeachment against Trump for taking a dump, they'd vote for it.

Impeachment is done entirely within the law. There are rules that needs to be followed.

Could you Please explain to me how what Trump did incites a riot?. Thanks!

Better if you just read the Article itself. It’s in plain language.

There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. I'll give you won. PA expanded their laws in direct violation of their constitution. Please by all means, refute that one.

Plenty of evidence that wasn’t included in Trump’s cases. So, what’s the point. PA Court didn’t stop the voting with those changes. Not sure how you can conclude they were illegal.

 

[krideynyc]

Okay, so you are admitting that Democrats are illegally trying to toss out Republican house members?

Nothing illegal about it. Those GOP members are noted and will be targeted heavily come next election. Unless they resign first.

 

[krideynyc]

Nancy Pelosi inciting violence. Way more than Trump ever has. Remove her. Double standard is so glaring. Its pathetic.

Bring up a case against her in the House. File a Civil lawsuit. You have plenty of legal means to make that happen.

 

[KittyHawk]

There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. I'll give you won. PA expanded their laws in direct violation of their constitution. Please by all means, refute that one.

The sudden push for mail in ballots, the midnight shutdown that had Trump ahead before and Biden ahead after, video of ballots being loaded into a dumpster by a USPS worker and security camera footage of poll workers filling out and/or changing ballots, Republican pollwatchers being forced to watch from 100 ft away and approximately 1000 siigned affadavits claiming fraud. I'm sure that's all just coincidence but it does make me wonder.

 

[Softball1]

This has to be a joke. The Democratic house is going to vote to impeach regardless of the law. If they brought forth an impeachment against Trump for taking a dump, they'd vote for it.

Could you Please explain to me how what Trump did incites a riot?. Thanks!

There is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. I'll give you won. PA expanded their laws in direct violation of their constitution. Please by all means, refute that one.

Refute: This is pulled from Politifact for full transparency:

• The Pennsylvania Constitution sets specific reasons that voters can vote absentee, such as illness. It does not explicitly forbid mail-in voting.
• In October 2019, the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed Act 77 to permit no-excuse, mail-in voting
• The state Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging the law after the election, concluding it was untimely.for any other states?

Any other proof for any other state?

 

[krideynyc]

The sudden push for mail in ballots, the midnight shutdown that had Trump ahead before and Biden ahead after, video of ballots being loaded into a dumpster by a USPS worker and security camera footage of poll workers filling out and/or changing ballots, Republican pollwatchers being forced to watch from 100 ft away and approximately 1000 siigned affadavits claiming fraud. I'm sure that's all just coincidence but it does make me wonder.

We’ve discussed those affidvits plenty. If they qualified as evidence, those cases wouldn’t have been dismissed so quickly.

 

[Matawan3]

Refute: This is pulled from Politifact for full transparency:

• The Pennsylvania Constitution sets specific reasons that voters can vote absentee, such as illness. It does not explicitly forbid mail-in voting.
• In October 2019, the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed Act 77 to permit no-excuse, mail-in voting
• The state Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging the law after the election, concluding it was untimely.for any other states?

Any other proof for any other state?

Ahhh, Poltifact. My favorite source for fact checking disinformation.

The problem here is, Absentee and Mail in, are not the same thing. Absentee with reason. What reason? Covid? So we can go to the gorcery store but we can't vote in person? LOL All setup to get Biden the win. That demented old man didn't even hardly have to leave his basement. They just set it up for his win.

 

[Matawan3]

Impeachment is done entirely within the law. There are rules that needs to be followed.

Better if you just read the Article itself. It’s in plain language.

Plenty of evidence that wasn’t included in Trump’s cases. So, what’s the point. PA Court didn’t stop the voting with those changes. Not sure how you can conclude they were illegal.

You are really good at skewing things to avoid addressing question. I will give you that. Impeachment is nothing more than indictment in the civilian world. Just because someone is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty of it.

So lets try this again, under the law, how is Trump guilty of inciting a riot?

I don't get it? A vote outside of the framenwork of their constitution, is an illegal vote.

 

[Matawan3]

Nothing illegal about it. Those GOP members are noted and will be targeted heavily come next election. Unless they resign first.

LOL, so following the democratic process now = inciting a riot. What a joke.

So anyone who's ever thought an an election was fraudulant is now a target? Guess its time to remove all the Democrats over 2016!

So again, how is challenging an election = to inciting a riot? Please I am interested.

 

[krideynyc]

You are really good at skewing things to avoid addressing question. I will give you that. Impeachment is nothing more than indictment in the civilian world. Just because someone is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty of it.

Ah, no. It’s reserved for one person, and only the House has the privilege. Don’t think this is close to common law. You have no idea how wrong you are with that statement.

So lets try this again, under the law, how is Trump guilty of inciting a riot?

Already explained in the Article of Impeachment. If you have questions with the facts within that document, ask then.

I don't get it? A vote outside of the framenwork of their constitution, is an illegal vote.

How are they operating outside their framework?

 

[krideynyc]

LOL, so following the democratic process now = inciting a riot. What a joke.

Wrong conclusion. Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech are not in question. What was said and the result is at question.

So anyone who's ever thought an an election was fraudulant is now a target? Guess its time to remove all the Democrats over 2016!

Not the thought. The continued support even after the process is over. Demonstrates they don’t have a grasp of reality, and isn’t qualified to hold office.

So again, how is challenging an election = to inciting a riot? Please I am interested.

It’s not. Show me where I said that. And don’t come back with the “Oh, I thought you said that” defense. You already used that one.

 

[BVBV]

Matawan don't you know that Nancy Pelosi, Blue State Govs, or anyone with a D next to their names are protected by the media. The intentions of liberals is what is important no matter how bad the results. Just a hint usually the actions of liberals result in loss of freedom and more Govt control.

 

[krideynyc]

Matawan don't you know that Nancy Pelosi, Blue State Govs, or anyone with a D next to their names are protected by the media. The intentions of liberals is what is important no matter how bad the results. Just a hint usually the actions of liberals result in loss of freedom and more Govt control.

The Impeachment proceedings are not the product of the media. It’s public record.

 

[BVBV]

Did not say it was. Just making a point about media bias and the dangers liberalism is to freedom.

 

[krideynyc]

Did not say it was. Just making a point about media bias and the dangers liberalism is to freedom.

Been meaning to mention this: you really should start using the Reply button. It will clarify what you are replying to. I thought you were replying to his comments about the Impeachment process.

 

[scrubs321]

The "elections were rigged" is a lie. Maybe Trump is too dumb to know this, but the GOP and FOX know it. They tell this lie for money and power, and know how they have radicalized their base. Blood has been spilled, a civil war is brewing. Enough is enough. Sedition charges should be given out to the whole lot of them.

 

[Softball1]

Ahhh, Poltifact. My favorite source for fact checking disinformation.

The problem here is, Absentee and Mail in, are not the same thing. Absentee with reason. What reason? Covid? So we can go to the gorcery store but we can't vote in person? LOL All setup to get Biden the win. That demented old man didn't even hardly have to leave his basement. They just set it up for his win.

>Absentee with reason. What reason? Covid?< Ahhhh ... yes. thank God many states realized that Covid was indeed real and provided accomodations for registered legal voters to participate without fear. Or have you forgotten that almost 400,000 US citizens have died of this deadly disease? The PA legislature approved no excuse mail in voting, period. Get over it.

 

[krideynyc]

obviously not official as of right now. so not fact

Official now. 10 GOP voted “Yea”. None did that for the first Impeachment. 232 to 197, 5 Abstained.

Of all the GOP members to make a statement, none accused the election as “stolen”.