AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

CA Ruby is back $300 GFE

SaltyCatBear

Review Contributor
Messages: 2,832
Reviews: 43
Joined
Is she worth for $300? I kinda forget her looks. Just remember she's a young college girl with slender body
I honestly don't think so, because I had Adel 2x for 280, and adel was miles better. The only thing really going on for Ruby is that she got a tight fit body with natural big titties. The face is good but not great. I felt like Adela (bgc) and Bora were all prettier than her.

That being said, I'm still going to see her again, just because I love watching natural big titties bounce around.
 

mtcloudfire

Registered Member
Messages: 29
Reviews: 1
Joined
I honestly don't think so, because I had Adel 2x for 280, and adel was miles better. The only thing really going on for Ruby is that she got a tight fit body with natural big titties. The face is good but not great. I felt like Adela (bgc) and Bora were all prettier than her.

That being said, I'm still going to see her again, just because I love watching natural big titties bounce around.
someone else said the boobs aren't real
 

stef_sandoval

Registered Member
Messages: 1,169
Reviews: 1
Joined
she getting hype because she's at $300. by far the most of any k-girl in sf ever. unfortunately, during covid era, that makes her the "best" which doesn't mean much.
I wouldn't go as far as the best. I've never tried her but her pics are very real besides the almost complete blurred faced. I'm just going off physical attraction but something tells me in my opinion if I ever try out Ruby I'm still team Allison as the hottest in the bay. I could be wrong. I'm also going off discussion's. I don't doubt that Ruby is in the top 3 without a doubt in the bay as the hottest without a doubt.
 

mtcloudfire

Registered Member
Messages: 29
Reviews: 1
Joined
I wouldn't go as far as the best. I've never tried her but her pics are very real besides the almost complete blurred faced. I'm just going off physical attraction but something tells me in my opinion if I ever try out Ruby I'm still team Allison as the hottest in the bay. I could be wrong. I'm also going off discussion's. I don't doubt that Ruby is in the top 3 without a doubt in the bay as the hottest without a doubt.
that's why i said "best" in apostrophes not best. as in she's not the best, just supposedly due to price. get it?

i feel bad for suckers who pay $300. now the orgs will think $300 is ok to charge
 

stef_sandoval

Registered Member
Messages: 1,169
Reviews: 1
Joined
that's why i said "best" in apostrophes not best. as in she's not the best, just supposedly due to price. get it?

i feel bad for suckers who pay $300. now the orgs will think $300 is ok to charge
I don't like the prices but honestly who else besides Allison can compete with Ruby. The bay needs more Rubies and Allison's or even Adel's. A lot more of them. I have my list of cuties in the bay but ddg as of right now I would say there's just two.
 

Steadyfast

Registered Member
Messages: 67
Joined
that's why i said "best" in apostrophes not best. as in she's not the best, just supposedly due to price. get it?

i feel bad for suckers who pay $300. now the orgs will think $300 is ok to charge
I agree. Ruby maybe worth $300 and clearly there are customers willing to pay that much to see her but it's setting a bad precedence. Now orgs will start taking advantage and feature girls from LA at $300/hr or even $500/hr claiming they are "ig models."

I dunno call me old school but i thought there were rules to this game; if you want to charge $300 be independent. I have no problem dropping $300/hr or even $500/hr on an indie girl coz she is taking the risk and bearing the all the costs; or at least creates that illusion.

But for an AAMP to host some girls at $300 and others at $240 is unfair to the girls and customers. If a girl is hotter and/or provides better service she will certainly get more customers and she can even be more selective.
 

stef_sandoval

Registered Member
Messages: 1,169
Reviews: 1
Joined
I agree. Ruby maybe worth $300 and clearly there are customers willing to pay that much to see her but it's setting a bad precedence. Now orgs will start taking advantage and feature girls from LA at $300/hr or even $500/hr claiming they are "ig models."

I dunno call me old school but i thought there were rules to this game; if you want to charge $300 be independent. I have no problem dropping $300/hr or even $500/hr on an indie girl coz she is taking the risk and bearing the all the costs; or at least creates that illusion.

But for an AAMP to host some girls at $300 and others at $240 is unfair to the girls and customers. If a girl is hotter and/or provides better service she will certainly get more customers and she can even be more selective.
I agree. But what if the girl doesn't want a lot of customers but just a consistent low volume per day.
 

kgirlfan123

Review Contributor
Messages: 93
Reviews: 5
Joined
I dunno call me old school but i thought there were rules to this game; if you want to charge $300 be independent. I have no problem dropping $300/hr or even $500/hr on an indie girl coz she is taking the risk and bearing the all the costs; or at least creates that illusion.

But for an AAMP to host some girls at $300 and others at $240 is unfair to the girls and customers. If a girl is hotter and/or provides better service she will certainly get more customers and she can even be more selective.
Agreed! 1 org, 1 price should be the standard! The model for the most successful orgs has long been "trickle down AAMPonomics" - have 1-2 superstars who are consistently booked plus a roster of solid performers so that when a horny monger can't see the superstar, he will often see her roommate/orgmate instead. Just like Viola, Cara, KGA with Yuna, BGC with Gigi, and many others did it when they started.
 

Steadyfast

Registered Member
Messages: 67
Joined
I agree. But what if the girl doesn't want a lot of customers but just a consistent low volume per day.
If the girl wants to see a consistent low volume of customers per day that's fine. But if she ALSO wants to make the same loot as she would have made if she was busy, then i feel it's selfish to pull that off at an aamp.

But then again what do I know, people often call me a grouch lol
 
Top