In good faith? How? You accused me of basing my arguments on nothing, but you never expressed anything but unsupported opinions. At least I made the effort to cite examples to disprove your arguments.
Nope, not going to convince each other. But at least I don't argue illogically. The whole argument started because you misread what I meant by security. And then refuse to admit that the security is valid. Even though you admit those exact criminal enterprises still exist today, and didn't die off 40 years ago. You argued about the spas not willing to file charges, but ignored the my argument that they could file charges. And then you completely ignore the fact that charges can only exist if someone files a complaint. So it's OK for the spas to not file them, but totally fine because the security wouldn't because it would be a risk. Finally, you posted after
@Anonajohn's post, but takes a dig at my post? Hypocrite.